Eyes Openers
  • World News
  • Business
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • World News
  • Business
  • Stocks
  • Politics

Eyes Openers

Business

James Stunt cleared of forgery but faces money-laundering retrial

by December 15, 2022
December 15, 2022
James Stunt cleared of forgery but faces money-laundering retrial

James Stunt, the socialite and former son-in-law of Bernie Ecclestone, faces a retrial over his alleged role in a £260 million money-laundering scam after the jury failed to reach a verdict.

Stunt, 40, who was married to the British model Petra Ecclestone, 33, for six years, was also found not guilty of forgery at Leeds Cloth Hall court.

He was one of eight defendants on trial over an alleged criminal network under which, prosecutors said, £266 million was deposited in the bank account of the gold dealership Fowler Oldfield from 2014 to 2016.

Four of the defendants were cleared of money laundering: Paul Miller, 45; Heidi Buckler, 45; Alexander Tulloch, 41; and Francesca Sota, 34. The jury was unable to reach verdicts on the money-laundering charge against four others including Stunt. They now face retrial.

Stunt married Petra Ecclestone in 2011. The couple had three children before divorcing in 2017.

In October the court was told that during Stunt’s alleged involvement with the scam he posed for photographs with the King. Between 2014 and 2016 he gave £140,000 to charities run by Charles, then Prince of Wales, the court was told.

Stunt claimed to have had several high-profile visitors to his Mayfair office, including David Cameron, who was prime minister at the time, and Middle Eastern royalty. Stunt at one stage told the court: “I knew the prime minister intimately.” A retrial date is yet to be announced.

He previously told the court he had become a “reclusive pariah” after the judge froze his bank accounts. Stunt claimed the order left him bankrupt and homeless. The decision to freeze his assets was a “draconian act”, Stunt said.

Asked by Nicholas Clarke KC, for the prosecution, about his claims during evidence that the seizure of his assets was illegal, Stunt said: “When I say ‘illegal’, yes, OK, that’s semantics: highly unethical, immoral.”

Clarke said that rather than being “homeless”, arrangements were made for Stunt to live in a five-storey property in South Kensington that had six bedrooms and a cinema room, and cost £9,995 a month in rent. Stunt said: “Yes, after three months my father decided to help out his son, and it’s humbling. I was homeless for three months.”

Read more:
James Stunt cleared of forgery but faces money-laundering retrial

previous post
The Battle Against Inflation May Have Only Just Begun
next post
China’s COVID spike not due to lifting of restrictions — WHO director

Related Posts

Developing DApps: The Best 6 Blockchains

December 2, 2022

Mike Ashley’s Frasers Group snaps up Luton mall...

March 18, 2023

How do you choose the right precious metals...

January 25, 2023

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Popular Posts

    • 1

      Head of Republican Party mocks speaking abilities of Fetterman, Biden

      October 28, 2022
    • 2

      Biden’s unwarranted bragging about reducing the budget deficit

      September 26, 2022
    • 3

      Russian TV is very excited about Такер Карлсон’s Nord Stream theory

      September 30, 2022
    • 4

      Strong Sector Rotation To Financials, but will it be enough to turn the market back up?

      October 14, 2022
    • 5

      Mish’s Daily: Mid-September Column Highlights

      September 29, 2022

    Categories

    • Business (1,468)
    • Politics (1,685)
    • Stocks (612)
    • World News (1,107)
    • About Us
    • Contacts
    • Terms & Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Email Whitelisting

    Disclaimer: EyesOpeners.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2023 EyesOpeners.com | All Rights Reserved