Eyes Openers
  • World News
  • Business
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • World News
  • Business
  • Stocks
  • Politics

Eyes Openers

Politics

Sen. Tuberville rises to the defense of racists in the armed forces

by May 11, 2023
May 11, 2023
Sen. Tuberville rises to the defense of racists in the armed forces

Sen. Tommy Tuberville (R-Ala.) offered an unusual criticism of the Biden administration in a radio interview this week.

“We, our military and [Defense Secretary Lloyd] Austin put out an order to stand down and all military across the country, saying we’re going to run out the White nationalists, people that don’t believe how we believe,” he told NPR affiliate WBHM. “And that’s not how we do it in this country.”

He was asked if White nationalists should be allowed to serve in the military.

“They call them that,” he replied. “I call them Americans.”

Tuberville was elected to the Senate with President Donald Trump’s support in the 2020 election that Trump lost. Even before taking office, Tuberville pledged to oppose the electors cast by states Trump lost in an effort to slow or block Joe Biden’s ascension to the presidency.

In this interview, he appears to have embraced a different aspect of Trump-adjacent rhetoric: that Biden and his administration are trying to villainize the right as being riddled with racists and domestic terrorists. It’s just that he got it backward. Instead of suggesting that decent, hard-working Americans were being cast as racists, he’s suggesting that racists are simply decent, hard-working Americans.

The idea that Biden (and Austin by extension) are using accusations of White nationalism as a cudgel was a central part of Tucker Carlson’s rhetoric back in his Fox News days. Immediately after Biden’s inauguration, Carlson highlighted a portion of the new president’s speech in which he — obviously alluding to the riot at the Capitol two weeks before — swore to uproot extremism.

Biden promised to “confront and … defeat” the “rise of political extremism, white supremacy, [and] domestic terrorism” that the country was seeing.

“The question is,” Carlson said in response, “what does it mean to wage war on white supremacists? Can somebody tell us in very clear language what a white supremacist is?”

“Joe Biden is the president of the United States, not a high school debate coach,” Carlson continued. “He controls the largest military and law enforcement agencies in the world. He has now declared war, and we have a right to know, specifically and precisely, who exactly he has declared war on. Innocent people could be hurt in this war. They usually are. There could be collateral damage in this war, and the casualties will be Americans.”

This became a centerpiece of Carlson’s rhetoric and the right’s more broadly. Participants in the Capitol riot were depicted as victims of political targeting, with Carlson going to great lengths to suggest that they were set up to facilitate a war-on-terror-style crackdown against the right. A memo from the Justice Department pledging to address threats against school officials was recast as the government seeking to treat all parental complaints as criminal behavior.

In his comments to WBHM, Tuberville drew the same connection with Jan. 6, saying that the left has said that “all these people that came into the Capitol were extremists, they were against the country.”

More broadly, though, Tuberville’s comments tap into the even older idea that the left uses racism allegations as a cudgel. Particularly since the emergence of the Black Lives Matter movement, many on the right have portrayed race-centered criticism as a rhetorical cheat, an attempt to prevail in a debate by slapping the label “racist” on an opponent. This sense contributes to and feeds off the well-established sense of White insecurity that is at the heart of much of the support for Trump.

But, again, that’s not what Tuberville said. He said that White nationalists — definitionally people who believe in building a White-centric state — deserve to be heard, that suppressing their views and their involvement in the military is somehow contrary to core American principles. This, it’s safe to assume, is itself a minority position.

In a statement provided to Alabama-based AL.com, Tuberville’s office sought to “clarify” his comments.

“Sen. Tuberville’s quote that is cited shows that he was being skeptical of the notion that there are white nationalists in the military,” the statement read, “not that he believes they should be in the military. He believes the men and women in uniform are patriots. Secretary Austin seems to think otherwise, subjecting them to extremism training as his very first act in office.”

This, you’ll notice, is the preferred direction of the rhetorical arrow: Austin and the Biden administration are accusing average Americans of being sympathetic to racism.

This defense is made trickier, however, by Tuberville’s history. At an event for Trump in Nevada last year, he equated the beneficiaries of potential reparations for slavery — that is, Black people — with criminals.

“They want crime,” he said of Democrats, “because they want to take over what you got. They want to control what you have. They want reparations because they think the people that do the crime are owed that.”

When Tuberville was elected in 2020, Black Alabamians voted heavily for his opponent, incumbent Sen. Doug Jones (D).

In his interview with WBHM, Tuberville claimed that the military was having trouble hitting recruitment targets because “the Democrats are attacking our military, saying we need to get out the White extremists, the White nationalists, people that don’t believe in our agenda.”

A recent Pentagon report warned that White nationalists and other extremists sought to recruit members of the military and that, while the numbers were low, the presence of such extremists was a potent threat to national security.

That report was completed in October 2020, during Trump’s administration.

This post appeared first on The Washington Post
previous post
Biden administration mobilizes troops, prepares new asylum restriction
next post
Before Trump’s beef with CNN, they had a cozy, made-for-TV relationship

Related Posts

Parsing Clarence Thomas’s statements on the gifts he...

April 8, 2023

Bill aims to improve air travel for passengers...

May 6, 2023

Trump and advisers caught off guard by New...

April 1, 2023

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Popular Posts

    • 1

      Head of Republican Party mocks speaking abilities of Fetterman, Biden

      October 28, 2022
    • 2

      Head of International Monetary Fund warns of increased risks to stability of financial system after weeks of banking sector turmoil

      March 27, 2023
    • 3

      Biden’s unwarranted bragging about reducing the budget deficit

      September 26, 2022
    • 4

      Russian TV is very excited about Такер Карлсон’s Nord Stream theory

      September 30, 2022
    • 5

      Strong Sector Rotation To Financials, but will it be enough to turn the market back up?

      October 14, 2022

    Categories

    • Business (1,975)
    • Politics (2,253)
    • Stocks (869)
    • World News (1,469)
    • About Us
    • Contacts
    • Terms & Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Email Whitelisting

    Disclaimer: EyesOpeners.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2023 EyesOpeners.com | All Rights Reserved