Eyes Openers
  • World News
  • Business
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • World News
  • Business
  • Stocks
  • Politics

Eyes Openers

Politics

Appeals court won’t block Trump deposition in ex-FBI employees’ suit

by September 2, 2023
September 2, 2023
Appeals court won’t block Trump deposition in ex-FBI employees’ suit

An appellate court won’t block former president Donald Trump from being questioned under oath in a lawsuit brought by two former FBI employees who say his administration persecuted them for political reasons.

The Justice Department sought to block Trump from being compelled to answer questions about the handling of text messages between FBI attorney Lisa Page and FBI agent Peter Strzok that exposed their opposition to his candidacy and their personal relationship. The two are suing the Justice Department, not Trump, but say the former president was inappropriately involved in how they were treated.

Judge Amy Berman Jackson allowed for the two-hour deposition earlier this year, saying that Trump’s repeated public statements about the pair justifies further probing of whether he pressured the Justice Department to retaliate against them after the investigation of Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election.

A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit on Friday denied an emergency petition from the Justice Department to block Berman Jackson’s ruling. Absent another appeal, Trump’s deposition will now go forward. The former president has not intervened to prevent the deposition.

The two judges who voted to deny the Justice Department petition are Democratic appointees; a Republican appointee on the panel said she would have blocked the deposition.

Page, who resigned, says the texts were released in violation of her privacy; Strzok says he was fired in retaliation for protected speech.

Both were assigned before that election to investigate whether Hillary Clinton broke the law by using a private email server and Russian interference into Trump’s campaign. The exposure of their anti-Trump messages in 2017 fueled Republican allegations that FBI bias drove the Russia probe. An inspector general investigation found no evidence that their opinions affected their work; a special counsel appointed by Trump was more critical of the FBI but agreed investigating Russian interference was warranted.

Attorneys for the Justice Department argued that other officials have already testified that their decisions to release the texts and fire Strzok were made independently of Trump. But the plaintiffs say some of those officials did not recall relevant details, and note that Trump personally took credit for driving them both out of the FBI.

This post appeared first on The Washington Post
previous post
FTC, Amgen reach deal to allow $28 billion pharmaceutical merger
next post
‘We need 50 million bucks’ and other takeaways from a pro-DeSantis PAC’s pitch

Related Posts

Fla. Supreme Court justices question long-standing abortion protections

September 9, 2023

Nikki Haley is betting on an electability message...

September 17, 2023

American politics in an aging America

September 12, 2023

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Popular Posts

    • 1

      President Biden visits D.C. middle school to mark the start of classes

      August 29, 2023
    • 2

      What NOT To Do as a Trader

      August 30, 2023
    • 3

      Japan’s ‘militarization’ complicates Asia-Pacific — Medvedev

      September 3, 2023
    • 4

      Three Ways I Use RSI To Analyze Trends

      September 2, 2023
    • 5

      Plenty of Setups Emerge as Bulls Regain Control

      September 2, 2023

    Categories

    • Business (249)
    • Politics (298)
    • Stocks (128)
    • World News (208)
    • About Us
    • Contacts
    • Terms & Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Email Whitelisting

    Disclaimer: EyesOpeners.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2023 EyesOpeners.com | All Rights Reserved