Eyes Openers
  • World News
  • Business
  • Stocks
  • Politics
  • World News
  • Business
  • Stocks
  • Politics

Eyes Openers

Politics

Ex-employee sues CPAC alleging racial bias, defamation by Schlapp, others

by September 2, 2023
September 2, 2023
Ex-employee sues CPAC alleging racial bias, defamation by Schlapp, others

A former employee of the Conservative Political Action Conference is suing the group, alleging racial discrimination and defamation by her former bosses, including the influential organization’s leader, Matt Schlapp.

Regina Bratton, who worked as a communications and marketing supervisor in 2021 and 2022, said in the lawsuit filed in federal court in Virginia on Friday that she was the only African American employee out of about 30 employees, interns and volunteers across CPAC. She claims she faced hostility up and down the chain of command.

CPAC leadership “conspired to and embarked upon a systematic, concerted effort to create a hostile work environment,” the suit alleges. The suit seeks $55 million in damages.

The lawsuit also names as defendants CPAC’s parent organization, the American Conservative Union, and its foundation arm. Schlapp, a prominent ally of former president Donald Trump; Schlapp’s wife and CPAC senior fellow Mercedes Schlapp; and general counsel David Safavian are also listed as defendants.

“The culture at CPAC was terrible, as Matt Schlapp and his wife, Mercedes Schlapp, ran the organization as if they were the King and Queen — like a dictatorship which ignored rules, laws, and basic decency when dealing with employees,” the lawsuit says.

CPAC’s parent organization said Friday that the lawsuit had no merit.

“ACU will vigorously defend against this suit, which was filed by a disgruntled former employee,” the organization said in a statement. “As CPAC continues to expand both in the US and internationally, we will weather these attacks and stay focused on the mission (of) fighting for America and Freedom.”

The lawsuit threatens to compound CPAC’s mounting legal expenses. Earlier this year, Republican operative Carlton Huffman sued Schlapp, accusing him of sexual battery and defamation in a suit seeking $9.4 million in damages. Schlapp has staunchly denied any wrongdoing.

Several veteran board members have quit in recent months while raising concerns about Schlapp’s financial oversight and heavy staff turnover.

Last week, the ACU board’s vice chairman, Charlie Gerow, resigned and urged fellow board members to launch an independent investigation into any additional allegations of sexual misconduct besides those in the lawsuit filed by Huffman earlier this year. Some board members and staffers have been told about other incidents involving Schlapp, 55, and two younger men, The Washington Post has reported.

Matt Smith, a member of the American Conservative Union’s executive committee, issued a statement last week condemning those allegations as “completely fabricated.”

In the latest lawsuit, Bratton alleges a subordinate was repeatedly hostile and defiant toward her and told her that he didn’t like “working with or for women.” Bratton also said that as she tried to hire a diverse group of freelancers, the staffer complained that CPAC was “not an affirmative action employer.”

Bratton said she was under pressure to perform personal tasks for the Schlapps outside of her job description. She was asked to style Mercedes Schlapp’s hair and promote Matt Schlapp’s book, which she says was a personal project, according to the lawsuit.

Bratton said she complained to her bosses about a number of workplace issues and raised concerns about racial bias but was retaliated against. She also claims she was fired for having another job even though she had disclosed to the Schlapps that she was working for a media company that operates as the Washington news bureau of the Chinese government outlet CCTV. Bratton alleges she later learned that the Schlapps and Safavian suggested she was fired for being “an agent for China.”

Another ACU board member, Jim McLaughlin, said in an interview on Thursday, before the latest suit was filed, that he remained confident in Schlapp and CPAC. He noted that the organization had been struggling financially before Schlapp took over in 2014.

“I am a big fan,” he said. “Is everything perfect? No. But I don’t think there has been malfeasance.”

Isaac Arnsdorf contributed to this report.

This post appeared first on The Washington Post
previous post
10 Tips For Better Investments
next post
Trump lawyers evoke 1931 trial of ‘Scottsboro boys’ in election case

Related Posts

Non-White Americans are much more confident in democracy

September 19, 2023

What we know about Grassley, Pence and Jan....

September 8, 2023

Trump’s Truth Social facing a key funding deadline

September 2, 2023

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Popular Posts

    • 1

      What NOT To Do as a Trader

      August 30, 2023
    • 2

      Ramaswamy distills Republican race rhetoric to its essence

      August 29, 2023
    • 3

      Three US Marines die in Australia aircraft crash during exercises

      August 28, 2023
    • 4

      President Biden visits D.C. middle school to mark the start of classes

      August 29, 2023
    • 5

      Three Ways I Use RSI To Analyze Trends

      September 2, 2023

    Categories

    • Business (257)
    • Politics (326)
    • Stocks (138)
    • World News (208)
    • About Us
    • Contacts
    • Terms & Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Email Whitelisting

    Disclaimer: EyesOpeners.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2023 EyesOpeners.com | All Rights Reserved