Business

Richard Donoff is a financial services professional with more than 30 years of experience working with retirees and families on long-term financial planning.

Known as “The Safe Money Doctor,” he has built his career around the idea that financial stability requires careful thinking and long-term discipline.

Donoff is the Managing Partner at Sunshine Financial Partners and the President of Richard Donoff & Associates, a firm he founded in 1999. He started the company as a grassroots operation and grew it into a national organisation generating $30 million in annual sales. Along the way, he recruited and trained a network of more than 280 agents, helping expand the firm’s reach across multiple markets.

He is recognised for developing a “Health Insurance Package Program” concept, which offered a more comprehensive approach compared to traditional single-policy models. His leadership also contributed to a 350 percent increase in disability insurance sales for Pennsylvania Life across Florida and Georgia. Early in his career, he was named Salesman of the Year by American National Insurance.

Originally from Philadelphia, Donoff studied Business Administration at Temple University and later completed further studies in Marketing and Finance at Washington University in St. Louis.

Outside of business, he enjoys photography, saltwater aquariums, and sports. He has been married to his wife Ellen for over four decades and values time with his children and grandchildren. His career reflects a consistent focus on preparation, stability, and long-term thinking.

Richard Donoff on Building a Career in Financial Services

Q: Let’s start at the beginning. What was your early life like growing up in Philadelphia?

A: I grew up in Philadelphia in a middle-class family with loving parents and a brother. It was a supportive environment. I was into sports, photography, and even played the drums. Those interests stayed with me over time, especially photography. Looking back, I think growing up that way gave me a strong work ethic.

Q: What led you into business and finance?

A: My education played a big role. I studied Business Administration at Temple University, and later Marketing and Finance at Washington University in St. Louis. I became interested in how businesses grow and how people make decisions. Marketing, in particular, teaches you how to understand people, and that stayed with me throughout my career.

Q: Your early career wasn’t in financial services. What were those first roles like?

A: That’s right. I worked with Sealy Mattress Company, where I was involved in product design and development. Some of the ideas we worked on are still used today. Later, I worked on building a dealer network for Coca-Cola focused on in-office beverage systems. That experience taught me a lot about scaling and distribution.

Q: When did you move into financial services?

A: That came later. After working in a few different businesses, I moved into financial services and found that it aligned well with my skills. I’ve now been in the industry for over 30 years. It’s an area where you can combine business, strategy, and communication.

Q: You founded Richard Donoff & Associates in 1999. What do you remember about those early days?

A: It started as a grassroots effort. We didn’t have a large team at first. We focused on building something from the ground up. Over time, we grew to 284 agents and reached $30 million in annual sales. That growth came from consistency and effort.

Q: What were some key milestones in that growth?

A: One was developing what we called a Health Insurance Package Program. Instead of offering a single policy, we created a more comprehensive approach. That helped us stand out. We also saw strong results with Pennsylvania Life, where sales increased by 350 percent in certain regions.

Q: You’ve been called “The Safe Money Doctor.” Where did that come from?

A: It comes from how I think about financial health. I often compare finances to physical health. If you follow a sound plan, you can create long-term stability. The nickname reflects that idea.

Q: What has kept you in this industry for so long?

A: It’s the long-term nature of the work. You’re dealing with decisions that affect people for decades. That requires responsibility and consistency. I’ve always focused on helping people understand the bigger picture.

Q: How has the industry changed over the years?

A: It has become more complex. There’s more information available, but that can also create confusion. People need clarity. That’s something I’ve always tried to focus on—keeping things understandable.

Q: What does leadership mean to you after building large teams?

A: Leadership is about consistency and example. When you build a team of over 200 people, you need to create structure and clear expectations. It’s not just about growth. It’s about maintaining standards.

Q: Outside of work, what keeps you busy?

A: I enjoy saltwater aquariums. They require patience and attention to detail. I also still enjoy photography and sports. Most importantly, I spend time with my wife, our children, and our grandchildren.

Q: Looking back, what stands out most about your career?

A: Building something from nothing. Starting a company and growing it over time is something I’m proud of. It takes persistence.

Read more:
Richard Donoff on Business Growth and Industry Experience

Tabber B. Benedict is the Founder and Managing Partner of Benedict Advisors PLLC, a law firm established in 2025 to deliver BigLaw-trained legal services to lower middle-market businesses.

A graduate of Columbia Law School, he trained at elite firms including White & Case LLP and Schulte Roth & Zabel (now McDermott Will & Schulte). He also gained experience at the White House, the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, and ACE Limited (now Chubb), building a foundation shaped by high-level institutional standards.

With more than 25 years of professional experience, Tabber has helped close transactions valued at over $100 billion in aggregate. His work spans mergers and acquisitions, corporate finance, private equity, and complex commercial matters. He serves businesses from idea-stage through approximately $150 million in enterprise value, bringing Fortune 500-calibre insight to companies that typically lack access to that level of counsel.

Recently sworn into the Southern District of New York, one of the most respected federal courts in the United States, Tabber continues to expand the forums in which he can advocate for clients. He approaches each matter with discipline and personal investment, working alongside senior litigators when cases require courtroom strength.

What sets him apart is his blend of elite institutional training and entrepreneurial accessibility. He believes reputation matters more than short-term gain. His focus is simple: clear strategy, precise execution, and long-term client success.

Q&A:

Q: Let’s start at the beginning. What shaped your path into corporate law?

I was drawn to environments where decisions carry real weight. That led me to Columbia Law School, and from there into elite firms like White & Case and Schulte Roth & Zabel. Those years were formative. You are trained to think precisely, prepare thoroughly, and anticipate consequences several steps ahead.

I also had the opportunity to gain experience at the White House, the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, and ACE Limited, now Chubb. Those roles exposed me to how policy, regulation and large institutions actually function. It gave me a broader perspective beyond transactions.

Q: You spent years in BigLaw. What did that experience teach you?

BigLaw teaches discipline. It teaches standards. It also teaches scale. I worked on complex mergers, corporate finance matters and private equity transactions that, in aggregate, have exceeded $100 billion in value.

But what stayed with me was not just the size of the deals. It was the preparation. Every clause is reviewed. Every assumption is tested. That level of rigour became foundational for me.

Q: Why did you decide to found Benedict Advisors PLLC in 2025?

I saw a gap. Lower middle-market businesses often face sophisticated legal challenges, yet they do not always receive partner-level attention. I wanted to bring Fortune 500-calibre legal expertise to companies from idea-stage through roughly $150 million in enterprise value.

At Benedict Advisors, we focus on mergers and acquisitions, corporate transactions, external general counsel services and commercial litigation. The aim is not scale for its own sake. It is precision and accessibility.

Q: How would you describe your approach to clients?

I am an M&A and corporate attorney by training, but I answer to the needs of clients. I take pride in my work and I get invested in every matter.

Sometimes a transaction evolves into a dispute. Sometimes a strategic issue requires stepping outside a traditional comfort zone. In those situations, I work closely with senior litigators, many with over 25 years of experience. Clients deserve depth, not improvisation.

Q: You were recently sworn into the Southern District of New York. What does that milestone represent for you?

The Southern District of New York is one of the most respected federal courts in the country. It dates back to 1789 and was established before the Supreme Court. Being admitted is not just a credential. It is a responsibility.

It expands the forums in which I can advocate for clients. It also reinforces the institutional standards I believe in. The Bar is small and well regarded. I am grateful to be part of it.

Q: What distinguishes Benedict Advisors from traditional firms?

It is the combination of elite institutional experience and entrepreneurial accessibility. Large corporations often receive direct partner involvement. Smaller businesses may not. I wanted to remove that divide.

We operate with systematic excellence. That means meticulous preparation, clear communication and disciplined execution. There is no unnecessary bureaucracy. Clients deal directly with senior counsel.

Q: How do you define success in your practice?

Success is measured by tangible business outcomes. That might be a transformative exit, securing funding, or resolving a complex dispute that allows a company to move forward.

Reputation matters more than short-term gain. Long-term relationships matter more than individual transactions. When clients return for every major milestone, that signals trust.

Q: Looking back over 25 years, how has your perspective evolved?

Early in my career, I focused on mastering the technical side of transactions. Over time, I realised that law is also about judgement. It is about understanding commercial realities and human dynamics.

I have built networks across New York, London, Dublin, Paris, Montreal, Miami, Boston, Chicago and Los Angeles. Those relationships reinforce that business is global, even for companies that start small.

Q: What continues to motivate you?

I enjoy solving problems that others consider intractable. Structuring a deal creatively. Navigating a difficult negotiation. Identifying a path where there appears to be none.

At its core, my work is about helping businesses move forward. That requires discipline, strategic thinking and partnership.

BigLaw excellence. Boutique dedication. True partnership. That mission continues to guide everything I do.

Read more:
Tabber B. Benedict on BigLaw, Boutique Strategy and Building Benedict Advisors

A Business Built on Discipline and Direction

In a fast-changing world, consistency is rare. Said Abulafia has built his career around it.

Based in Tel Aviv–Jaffa, Abulafia leads a historic family-owned bakery business operating since 1879. He is navigating one of the most unpredictable business environments in recent years. His approach is simple. Stay focused. Stay disciplined. Keep moving forward.

“Success to me is creating lasting value,” he says. “Having a positive impact on people, and maintaining consistency, discipline, and control over my direction.”

This mindset has shaped every stage of his journey.

From Law to a 19th-Century Family Business

Abulafia did not start in hospitality. His career began in corporate law.

He worked in the M&A department at what was then Israel’s largest law firm. The role gave him exposure to deals, structure, and high-level decision-making. But it wasn’t where he wanted to stay.

He made a shift. He joined his historic family-owned bakery business, a brand with roots going back to 1879.

That move changed everything.

Instead of advising businesses, he was now building one. Day-to-day operations replaced boardroom strategy. Execution became the priority.

“I focus more on what I can do in the near term to move in that direction,” he explains. “It’s more about staying consistent and moving forward than following a strict system.”

Leading Through Uncertainty in Hospitality

The past few years tested that mindset.

Abulafia ran the business through COVID-19 disruptions and ongoing instability. Demand shifted overnight. Supply chains became unpredictable. Costs increased.

Margins tightened from both sides.

“At one point, margins were getting squeezed from both sides — rising costs and unpredictable demand,” he recalls.

Instead of waiting for conditions to improve, he adapted.

He streamlined operations. He made the business leaner. He strengthened relationships with suppliers to secure better terms. He focused on consistency and quality to keep customers returning.

He also invested more in brand presence, rather than relying only on foot traffic.

“What initially felt like a setback ended up making the business more resilient,” he says.

The result was not just survival. It was a stronger operating model.

What Makes a Strong Business Leader Today

Abulafia’s leadership style is shaped by pressure.

He believes discipline matters more than motivation. Motivation comes and goes. Discipline stays.

“Consistency, resilience, and adaptability,” he says. “You learn quickly that discipline matters more than motivation, relationships matter more than transactions.”

He also emphasizes people.

Customers, employees, and partners are not just part of the system. They are the system. Strong relationships create long-term stability, especially in uncertain markets.

Another key idea is staying calm under pressure.

In hospitality, conditions can change daily. Leaders who react emotionally fall behind. Leaders who stay steady create clarity.

Balancing Growth with Personal Well-Being

Abulafia does not separate business performance from personal health.

He sees them as directly connected.

“When personal well-being is neglected, business performance inevitably suffers,” he says.

His routine reflects that belief. He prioritizes workouts, daily walks, and time to think. These are not extras. They are part of how he operates.

He also keeps his planning simple.

There is a long-term direction, but the focus stays on what matters now. He regularly checks what is working and adjusts.

This flexible approach allows him to stay responsive without losing direction.

Building Trust in a Complex Environment

One of the less visible challenges in Abulafia’s journey has been building trust.

“As someone operating as part of an Arab family business within a predominantly Jewish environment, it meant earning trust and integrating into a diverse setting,” he explains.

He approached this the same way he approaches business. Stay grounded. Focus on people. Be consistent over time.

Outside of work, he supports initiatives that promote dialogue between different communities. This reflects a broader belief that business and social impact are connected.

How Said Abulafia Defines Success Today

For Said Abulafia, success is not just about results.

It is about how those results are achieved.

“I look at success from a few angles,” he says. “The outcome is important, but so is how I got there, whether I stayed true to my own standards.”

Growth also plays a role.

He sees success as a process, not an endpoint. Even strong performance is a signal to keep improving.

“I don’t see success as an endpoint, but as a chance to grow into the next version of myself,” he adds.

Consistency Over Everything

Abulafia’s story is not about quick wins.

It is about steady progress under pressure.

He built his leadership style through real challenges. He refined it by staying consistent when conditions were unstable.

His approach is clear:

Focus on what you can control
Prioritize people
Stay disciplined
Adapt when needed

Above all, keep moving forward.

“What keeps me going is knowing that what I build can have a real, positive impact on people,” he says.

In a volatile industry, that mindset is what sets lasting businesses apart.

 

Read more:
Said Abulafia: Building Resilience in Hospitality

Resilience is one of those words that gets used a lot in business. But when you strip it back, it’s not complicated. It simply means being able to keep moving forward when things don’t go to plan.

And if the last few years have shown us anything, it’s that plans rarely stay fixed for long. Markets shift, technology moves quickly and economic uncertainty can appear with very little warning.

For leaders, especially those running small and medium-sized businesses, the challenge isn’t avoiding change. It’s helping your team deal with it.

In my experience, resilient businesses are almost always led by resilient people.

Over the past 25 years working in fire safety and security at Chubb, I’ve seen plenty of organisations face disruption. Some adapt quickly and come out stronger. Others struggle because uncertainty unsettles the team and slows decision-making.

More often than not, the difference comes down to leadership. Resilient leaders create an environment where people stay focused, tackle problems head-on and keep moving forward even when things feel uncertain.

Why leadership matters more than ever

There’s growing evidence that the quality of leadership has a direct impact on how well organisations cope with change.

The CIPD Good Work Index 2025 highlights how strongly supportive leadership and good line management influence employee engagement, motivation and wellbeing. The report shows that when people feel supported by their managers and trusted in their roles, they’re far more likely to stay motivated and perform well.

For SME leaders, that’s an important point.

Resilience isn’t something that only large organisations with big HR departments can build. In fact, smaller businesses often have an advantage because leaders are closer to their teams and communication tends to be more direct.

That visibility means leaders have a real opportunity to shape how people respond when challenges arise.

Resilience is something you build

One of the biggest misconceptions about resilience is that it’s something you either have or you don’t. In reality, resilience is something that can be developed.

Teams become more resilient when they’re trusted to solve problems, encouraged to learn from mistakes and given the confidence to take ownership of challenges. For leaders, creating that environment starts with the way we react when things go wrong.

It’s easy in business to look for someone to blame when a problem appears. But resilient organisations tend to take a different approach. Instead of focusing on who made the mistake, they focus on what can be learned and how the issue can be solved.

That shift in mindset builds confidence across the team. People feel safer speaking up, sharing ideas and taking responsibility.

Give people the space to step up

Another key part of building resilience is trust.

Strong leaders understand that people grow when they’re given the chance to think for themselves. When employees are empowered to make decisions and solve problems, they build confidence and adaptability. Over time, that confidence becomes one of the organisation’s biggest strengths.

Transparency also plays a big role here.

Periods of change can easily create uncertainty. And when leaders stay quiet, people often assume the worst. Being open about challenges helps teams understand the bigger picture and encourages everyone to pull together.

It doesn’t mean having all the answers. It simply means being honest about the situation and focusing on what can be done next.

Leadership shouldn’t sit with one person

Another lesson I’ve learned over the years is that resilience doesn’t sit with one individual. The strongest organisations develop leadership across the whole business.

Future leaders often appear in unexpected places, which is something I’ve discovered at Chubb through Building Great Leaders – a framework we’ve created to help our people develop their leadership competency, no matter what their role is. Someone who shows initiative, supports colleagues or steps up during a difficult project may well become a great leader with the right encouragement.

Businesses that invest time in developing people early tend to cope better when challenges arise. When people feel capable and trusted, they’re far more likely to step forward rather than step back. And that makes a huge difference when change inevitably comes along.

Culture sets the tone

In many ways, resilience spreads through culture. Teams take their cues from the behaviour of their leaders. If leaders remain calm, focus on solutions and encourage collaboration, those behaviours quickly become the norm.

But the opposite is also true. If leaders panic or avoid difficult conversations, that uncertainty spreads just as quickly.

That’s why leadership development matters so much. It’s not simply about preparing someone for a management role. It’s about helping people develop the mindset and skills needed to navigate uncertainty.

Helping teams face whatever comes next

Change is part of business. Technology evolves, customer expectations shift and markets rarely stay still. Leaders can’t remove that uncertainty. What we can do is shape how our teams respond to it.

The most resilient organisations are the ones where people feel confident tackling problems, supporting one another and adapting when circumstances change. And that starts with leadership.

Because in the end, resilient leadership isn’t about having every answer. It’s about giving your team the confidence to face whatever comes next.

Read more:
How resilient leaders help their teams thrive through change

Britain’s biggest mobile network operators have warned ministers they may be forced to ration access to phone signals and introduce surge pricing at peak times, as the war in Iran sends wholesale energy costs spiralling and Whitehall shuts the sector out of its flagship industrial support package.

In a pointed intervention to Government, VodafoneThree, Virgin Media O2 and BT-owned EE have confirmed they are drawing up emergency contingency plans to manage ballooning electricity bills, after being pointedly omitted from the Chancellor’s British Industrial Competitiveness Scheme (BICS).

Among the measures being modelled behind closed doors are the throttling of data speeds, restricting access during periods of high demand, and charging customers a premium at peak times, a move that would mark a significant departure from the all-you-can-eat tariffs that have dominated the British mobile market for more than a decade.

Voice calls and mobile data are expected to bear the brunt of any rationing, though fixed-line broadband services could also be affected. Senior industry figures have further cautioned that relentless cost pressures could see 5G rollout plans shelved, with jobs either cut outright or shifted overseas.

Frustration is running deep in the industry following Rachel Reeves’s announcement last week that 10,000 manufacturers would see their electricity bills cut by up to 25 per cent under BICS. Although the measures are not due to take effect until April 2027, telecoms bosses argue that their sector, classed as critical national infrastructure, has an equally compelling case for state intervention.

“It’s a serious oversight,” one industry source told Business Matters. “It raises real questions about which parts of the economy this Government actually considers strategically important.”

The sums involved are far from trivial. Britain’s mobile networks consume just under one terawatt-hour of electricity annually, enough to power 370,000 homes. While operators routinely hedge their exposure to the wholesale market, prices have still climbed by 70 per cent in recent years, first on the back of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and more recently following the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, the vital shipping lane that carries roughly a fifth of global oil and gas trade.

With UK electricity pricing still tethered to the gas market, the 33 per cent jump in gas prices since the outbreak of hostilities with Iran has fed directly through to operator cost bases. Unlike steelmakers or chemical plants, executives argue, mobile networks cannot simply shift demand to cheaper overnight hours. The “always on” nature of the infrastructure leaves them structurally exposed.

Any move to ration signal, understood to represent a worst-case scenario, would prove politically toxic in a country where consumers are already exasperated by patchy coverage. The UK currently props up the G7 table for 5G download speeds, and the broader economic stakes are considerable: digital connectivity is estimated to contribute £6.6bn annually to UK output.

The warning lands at an awkward moment for the Chancellor, who is already fielding criticism from manufacturing bodies that BICS is both too modest and too slow to arrive to stem further job losses.

A spokesman for Virgin Media O2 said: “Mobile and broadband networks are critical national infrastructure that almost every consumer and business relies on, yet despite their importance, telecoms companies have been excluded from support offered to other energy-intensive sectors. If the Government wants growth, productivity and resilience, it cannot overlook the digital networks the country depends on.”

VodafoneThree struck a similar note, with a spokesman adding: “We are disappointed that the Government has chosen not to include the telecoms sector in the British Industrial Competitiveness Scheme. At VodafoneThree we are committed to building the UK’s best network, creating jobs and fuelling billions of pounds of value to the UK economy. We urge the Government to consider the impact of rising energy prices on the vital telecoms sector that unlocks growth in all parts of the economy.”

For SMEs already grappling with patchy rural coverage and rising operating costs, the prospect of peak-time surcharges or throttled data could represent yet another headwind, and another reason to question whether Britain’s industrial strategy is keeping pace with the realities on the ground.

Read more:
Mobile operators warn of signal rationing as energy costs spiral

British businesses racing to embed artificial intelligence into their products risk leaving millions of disabled consumers behind unless they bring them into the design process from the outset, according to fresh research from the Business Disability Forum (BDF).

A poll of 1,032 disabled UK adults, conducted with Opinium, found that two in five (40%) believe designing, developing and testing AI products with disabled people is the single most effective way to make the technology genuinely accessible. The same survey identified more user-friendly interfaces (38%), better information about how AI can support disabled users (37%) and stronger onboarding support (36%) as further priorities.

For SMEs in particular, many of whom are weighing how, and how quickly, to integrate AI into customer-facing tools, the findings carry a clear commercial message. Roughly one in four people in the UK will experience disability at some point in their lifetime, representing a significant share of the consumer base and the workforce. Building products that fail to accommodate that audience is, increasingly, a competitive liability as well as an ethical one.

The research suggests considerable optimism about what the technology can deliver. More than a third of disabled adults said AI tools could help by improving communications (38%) and online experiences (34%). Other anticipated benefits included better access to healthcare information (33%), education (32%), digital content (32%), support for independent living (31%), improved customer experience (25%) and better access to employment (24%).

That optimism, however, is tempered by significant scepticism. One in five disabled UK adults (20%) said they did not believe AI products would help them at all, while a further 18% said they simply did not know, a sizeable trust gap that businesses will need to close if they want adoption to follow investment.

A parallel Opinium poll of 2,000 UK adults found broadly similar attitudes across the wider population, with 34% agreeing that co-designing AI products with disabled users would improve accessibility, evidence that inclusive design is increasingly viewed as a mainstream expectation rather than a niche concern.

Lara Davis, communications director at Business Disability Forum, said the stakes were considerable. “There is the potential for AI products and tools to make a radical and positive difference to disabled people’s lives, but there is also the risk that disabled people could be left behind,” she said. “With AI developing at pace and one in four people experiencing disability at some point in their lives, this is not an issue that we can afford to overlook.”

Davis urged firms to “actively consult with their disabled consumers to make sure they are involved in the design, development and testing of AI products”, alongside providing better access to information and advice about the technology more generally.

Lucy Ruck, who leads BDF’s Tech Taskforce, was equally direct. “AI has the capacity to transform lives, but only if we get inclusion right from the start,” she said. “Making sure that disabled people are active participants in shaping this technology isn’t just the right thing to do, it’s how we build AI that genuinely serves everyone.”

The forum has set out four recommendations for businesses and developers. They are urged to involve disabled people throughout the AI lifecycle, on the basis that inclusive design removes barriers for everyone, not only disabled consumers. They should publish clear information about the accessibility features of their AI products, in formats tailored to differing communication needs. Compatibility with assistive technology, on which many disabled users rely daily, must be tested rather than assumed. And ethical judgement and meaningful human oversight should be built into both the tools themselves and the content they generate, with inclusive training data used to reduce bias and stereotype.

For SME founders and product leaders, the message is one that has been heard before in other waves of digital transformation: retrofitting accessibility is invariably more expensive, and less effective, than designing it in from the start.

Read more:
Disabled consumers must shape AI from the start, business leaders warned

Royal Mail has put a £500 million price tag on rescuing its battered reputation for on-time delivery, unveiling a five-year recovery plan that will see Saturday second-class post wound down from May and thousands of part-time posties asked to take on full-time hours.

The pledge marks the first substantive operational reset under Czech billionaire Daniel Kretinsky, whose EP Group completed its £3.5 billion take-private of parent group International Distributions Services last year, lifting Britain’s letters monopoly off the London Stock Exchange after more than a decade as a quoted company.

Under the blueprint, the 510-year-old postal operator will spend £100 million a year creating the equivalent of 3,000 full-time delivery roles, achieved largely by persuading roughly 6,000 part-timers to lift their average week to 35 hours. The company has secured trade union backing for the package, no small feat in a business that has weathered some of the most bruising industrial disputes in recent British corporate history.

The numbers behind the overhaul lay bare just how far standards have slipped. Against a regulatory benchmark of delivering 93 per cent of first-class mail the next day, Royal Mail is currently managing 77 per cent, leaving nearly one letter in four arriving late. Second-class performance is little better, with 91 per cent landing on doormats within three days against a target of 98.5 per cent.

Ofcom has already softened the rulebook in the wake of the Kretinsky takeover, easing the universal service obligation to permit non-first-class items to be delivered on alternate days and trimming the regulatory targets to 90 per cent for next-day first-class and 95 per cent for three-day second-class. Royal Mail says it will hit those revised thresholds within twelve months of the new regime bedding in.

For SME owners and finance directors who have long complained that unreliable post is gumming up invoicing, contract delivery and customer correspondence, the proof will be in the doormat. The company’s own diagnosis pinpoints “completion rates of delivery routes” as the central failure, with an estimated 8 per cent of rounds either under-resourced or too unwieldy to be finished within the working day. A targeted shake-up of working practices is planned at the weakest performers among Royal Mail’s 1,200 delivery offices, with fresh recruitment focused on Oxford, Cambridge and London, where staff shortages have been most acute.

The pay backdrop is also instructive. Posties hired since 2022 are on the equivalent of £27,200 a year, around £1,800 below the £29,000 paid to longer-serving colleagues, a two-tier structure that has fuelled retention difficulties and which the move to fuller hours is designed, in part, to mitigate.

Alistair Cochrane, chief executive of Royal Mail, struck a contrite note. “We recognise our service hasn’t always been the standard our customers rightly expect and we’re determined to do better,” he said. His chairman went further when grilled by MPs in recent weeks, with Mr Kretinsky telling a parliamentary inquiry: “We are sorry for every letter that has arrived late,” before describing operations as “not perfect but not catastrophic”.

The political optics matter. The universal service obligation, baked in when David Cameron’s coalition floated Royal Mail in 2013, has been the convenient scapegoat for years of underperformance. With Ofcom now having loosened that corset, the excuses are wearing thin. Of Royal Mail’s 130,000-strong workforce, 80,000 are front-line delivery staff, and it is on their rounds that Mr Kretinsky’s £500 million bet will ultimately stand or fall.

For Britain’s small businesses, many of which still rely on the post for everything from cheques to compliance documents, the message from Mount Pleasant is one of cautious optimism. Whether the new owners can succeed where successive management teams have stumbled remains the open question.

Read more:
Royal Mail commits £500m to fix delivery failures as Kretinsky era takes shape

Rolls-Royce has been crowned the nation’s most iconic trade mark in a public poll marking 150 years since Britain became one of the first countries in the world to formalise the protection of brands, the Intellectual Property Office (IPO) has announced.

The Goodwood-built marque pipped Radio Caroline, Twinings and Cadbury to the top spot in a survey that drew around 2,000 nominations, with the public asked to choose the brands they felt had most shaped daily life in the UK. Rounding out the top ten were Bass, Burberry, the Transport for London roundel, Calpol, Mini and the BBC, a roll-call that reads less like a marketing list and more like a cultural autobiography of post-war Britain.

The poll coincides with the 150th anniversary of the UK trade mark register, which opened for business on 1 January 1876 following the passage of the Trade Marks Registration Act 1875. The very first mark to be registered, on day one, was the Bass & Co red triangle label, a piece of intellectual property still in use today and still, as one respondent succinctly observed, attached to “good beer”.

For the SME community, the milestone is more than ceremonial. The register now protects more than 2.5 million marks, with around 200,000 fresh applications received in the past year alone, a record-breaking figure that points to the value modern entrepreneurs place on owning their identity in an increasingly crowded marketplace.

More than 400 trade marks filed before 1900 remain live on the register, a remarkable testament to brand longevity. Bovril (1886), Drambuie (1893), Lyle’s Sugar (1887), Bird’s Custard Powder (1891), Rose’s Lime Juice Cordial (1876) and Woodward’s Gripe Water (1876) are all still trading on the goodwill first banked by their Victorian founders. Even Lyle’s Golden Syrup carries with it the gloriously biblical “Out of the Strong Came Forth Sweetness”, registered in 1884 and quietly enduring on supermarket shelves ever since.

Other Victorian filings border on the prophetic. Kodak was registered in 1888, just as mass photography was emerging, while a mark named “Millennium” was filed in January 1892, more than a century before the date it would come to evoke.

Adam Williams, chief executive of the IPO, said the anniversary underscored the role of trade marks as the bedrock of consumer confidence. “Trade marks are the foundation of brand trust. For 150 years, they’ve helped British businesses, from corner shops and market stalls to app stores and global online retailers, build lasting relationships with consumers and stand behind the quality of their products,” he said. “The tens of thousands who register a trade mark each year are making a statement: we’ve built something good, and we’re putting our name to it.”

Tom Reynolds, chief executive of the British Brands Group, described trade marks as “a legal promise” between business and customer. “Some trade marks have become so embedded in our lives that they’ve become shorthand for the thing itself. Think of a tick, a swoosh, or even a silver lady on a car bonnet. Instantly, you know exactly what you’re getting. That’s the power of a trade mark, and it’s the foundation every iconic brand is built on.”

Kelly Saliger, president of the Chartered Institute of Trade Mark Attorneys (CITMA), said the application surge confirmed the UK’s continuing pull as a centre of enterprise. “Brand recognition is a powerful asset, and a registered trade mark protects it, acting as a marker in the sand that warns other businesses to steer clear, and giving the owner the means to take action against those who come too close.”

Rolls-Royce, whose Silver Ghost was officially dubbed “the best car in the world” in 1913, has long since transcended the motor industry. Julian Jenkins, director of sales and brand at Rolls-Royce Motor Cars, said the result reflected the way the marque had become “a global shorthand for the best of the best in any field”. Matthew Hill, head of intellectual property at Rolls-Royce plc, added that the recognition acknowledged the company’s “continuing commitment to powering, protecting and connecting people everywhere”.

Radio Caroline, the offshore station that sailed into broadcasting history from the North Sea in 1964 and was finally registered as a trade mark in 1992, was second on the list. Station manager Peter Moore said the recognition was “a testament to our past, present and future”, while listeners reminisced about passing O-Levels to its broadcasts.

Twinings, which has traded from the same Strand address since 1706 and registered its mark in 1908, was third. Chief brand officer Heather Hartridge said the logo was “more than just a logo, it is a symbol of the craftsmanship, expertise and care that goes into every blend”.

Cadbury, first traded in 1824 and registered in 1886, was fourth. Equity marketing director Phil Warfield said the brand’s “iconic glass and a half” remained “a promise to our customers for generations”. Ewa Chappell, legal and corporate affairs director at Budweiser Brewing Group UK/Ireland, current custodians of Bass, noted that the original red triangle had been “copied so often that it proved just how powerful the demand for Bass truly was”.

Burberry’s check, born in the trenches of the First World War, made the list alongside the Transport for London roundel, first protected in 1917. TfL customer director Emma Strain said the symbol had “guided Londoners and visitors safely through the capital as a trusted and globally renowned emblem” for more than a century.

Calpol, the small bottle that has soothed generations of feverish children, sat eighth, with one parent describing it simply as “the first thing you reach for at 3am”. Mini, the diminutive motor that defined British car-making from 1959 onwards, was ninth. Head of MINI Jean-Philippe Parain said the brand “continues to stand for timeless design, go-kart handling, and distinctive personality”. The BBC completed the top ten.

When the 1875 Act took effect, applications arrived by post, were entered by hand, and could only protect marks used on physical goods. Today’s register tells a rather different story. Services as well as goods are covered, and registrable marks now include holograms, motion marks, multimedia marks and patterns of light. Applications cover categories that would have bewildered a Victorian clerk, from snack products derived from insects and edible ant larvae to wearable smartphones, humanoid robots, downloadable virtual handbags, and perfumes for use in virtual worlds.

For SMEs, the practical message is that trade mark protection has never been more accessible, or more strategically important. Registration costs a fraction of the goodwill it preserves, lasts for ten years and can be renewed indefinitely, providing the legal armoury to defend brand value as businesses scale.

After 150 years, Britain’s trade mark system has, in the IPO’s own words, “no sign of standing still”. For the small businesses building tomorrow’s iconic brands, that should be a reassuring thought.

Read more:
Rolls-Royce tops the list as Britain’s trade mark register turns 150

British small and medium-sized enterprises are facing a fresh squeeze on margins after official figures revealed inflation jumped to 3.3 per cent in March, the first hard evidence of how the Middle East conflict is feeding through to the real economy.

Data released by the Office for National Statistics on Wednesday showed the Consumer Prices Index accelerated from 3 per cent in February, in line with City forecasts and marking the first uptick in the headline rate since December. It is also the first inflation reading to capture the surge in global oil and gas prices since hostilities erupted two months ago, with Brent crude up roughly 30 per cent and trading around the $100-a-barrel mark for several weeks.

The pain at the pump was unmistakable. Petrol rose by 8.6 pence per litre to an average of 140.2p, its highest since August 2024, while diesel, the lifeblood of the haulage and trades sector, leapt by 17.6p to 158.7p, a level not seen since November 2023. For the nation’s 5.5 million SMEs, many of whom rely on vans, lorries and company cars to service customers, it amounts to a significant and largely unhedgeable operating cost.

Air fares added further heat, climbing 10 per cent month-on-month against a 0.3 per cent fall over the same period a year earlier. That is the steepest February-to-March rise since 2016, although the ONS noted that prices were collected before the outbreak of war and were inflated by the timing of long-haul flights immediately after Easter.

Grant Fitzner, chief economist at the ONS, said: “Inflation climbed in March, largely due to increased fuel prices, which saw their largest increase for over three years. Airfares were another upward driver this month, alongside rising food prices. The only significant offset came from clothing costs, where prices rose by less than this time last year.”

Economists at the International Monetary Fund and elsewhere have warned that the headline rate could climb through the summer and potentially peak above 5 per cent, more than double the Bank of England’s 2 per cent target. Core inflation, which strips out volatile food and energy components, edged down to 3.1 per cent from 3.2 per cent, but services inflation, the measure most closely watched by Threadneedle Street, ticked up to 4.5 per cent from 4.3 per cent. Food prices were 3.7 per cent higher year-on-year, a number that will ripple through hospitality margins.

The Bank of England’s monetary policy committee is expected to leave Bank Rate on hold at 3.75 per cent when it meets next Thursday, though rate-setters are facing an uncomfortable dilemma. Martin Beck, chief economist at WPI Strategy, said: “With inflation likely to remain above target for longer, the Bank of England is unlikely to cut rates any time soon. But equally, the case for further tightening remains weak. A prolonged period of policy on hold looks the most likely outcome, leaving the economy exposed to the trajectory of the conflict and its impact on energy markets.”

Peter Dixon, senior economist at the National Institute of Economic and Social Research, went further, arguing that the Bank “cannot risk appearing complacent, and we therefore expect one precautionary [quarter point] rate increase over the coming months”. A move of that kind would raise the cost of variable-rate borrowing for millions of homeowners and small business owners, and set back those attempting to step onto the property ladder.

There are, however, glimmers of resilience. GDP grew by a stronger-than-expected 0.5 per cent in February and unemployment fell unexpectedly to 4.9 per cent in the three months to February, down from 5.2 per cent, suggesting that, for now at least, the labour market is holding up despite the external shock.

Rachel Reeves, the chancellor, struck a sympathetic note: “This is not our war, but it is pushing up bills for families and businesses. That’s why it’s my number one priority to keep costs down.” The Treasury has so far extended support to a limited number of rural households dependent on heating oil and has widened an existing scheme aimed at cutting energy bills for businesses, though SME lobby groups are already pressing for more targeted relief for firms whose fuel and logistics costs cannot easily be passed on to customers.

For British SMEs, the immediate message from March’s data is stark: energy-driven cost inflation is back, interest rate relief is further away than many had hoped, and the next phase of the Middle East conflict will do as much to shape the outlook for cash flow and investment as anything decided in Westminster.

Read more:
Inflation climbs to 3.3% as middle east conflict drives up fuel bills for Britain’s SMEs

With the number of young Britons not in education, employment or training (NEET) closing in on the one million mark, McDonald’s UK has stepped into the breach with what it claims is the largest in-person work experience programme the country has ever seen.

The fast-food giant, one of the UK’s biggest employers of under-25s, today unveiled a nationwide scheme offering 2,500 paid placements in its first year, with a stated ambition to scale the commitment annually. Crucially for a generation increasingly priced out of unpaid internships, every placement will come with a wage attached.

The initiative will be delivered through McDonald’s network of franchisees, the local business owners who run the bulk of its 1,400-plus restaurants, and will be deliberately weighted towards the country’s NEET hotspots. A quarter of all placements have been earmarked for young people who are already NEET or considered at risk of becoming so.

To underpin the launch, McDonald’s has commissioned its first Youth Confidence Index, a piece of research that lays bare the gap between aspiration and opportunity confronting Britain’s under-25s. While 80 per cent of those in education, training or employment believe they have something positive to offer society, that figure plunges to 57 per cent among the NEET cohort. Two-thirds (67 per cent) of young people surveyed said they would jump at the chance to do work experience but cannot find it; almost seven in ten (69 per cent) cited a lack of opportunities locally, while 61 per cent said they simply could not afford to work for free.

It is a familiar picture to anyone who has covered the small business beat over the past decade, a labour market in which entry-level roles have thinned, hospitality and retail vacancies are no longer the rite of passage they once were, and the Bank of Mum and Dad has quietly become a prerequisite for a foot on the career ladder.

Lauren Schultz, chief executive of McDonald’s UK & Ireland, framed the move as both a commercial and civic responsibility. “At McDonald’s, we believe in the potential and ability of young people and want to help them make it,” she said. “With over 100,000 employees under 25 across the UK, we have the reach to make a real difference and are uniquely positioned to open doors at scale. Everything a young person needs to learn about the world of work, from communication to financial skills, can be mastered at McDonald’s.”

The announcement has been welcomed in Whitehall. Pat McFadden, Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, said the scheme demonstrated “what’s possible when Government and business help young people into work”, noting McDonald’s “strong track record” of training. The Rt Hon. Alan Milburn, who chairs the government’s Young People and Work Review, was rather less restrained, branding the NEET crisis “a national outrage with long-term consequences” and calling on other employers to follow suit.

Sector-watchers and academics were similarly supportive. Lee Elliot Major OBE, professor of social mobility at the University of Exeter, said: “We don’t have a shortage of talent in this country, we have a shortage of opportunity. By offering paid work experience at scale, McDonald’s is showing how businesses can boost social mobility and productivity, potentially transforming the life chances of thousands of young people.”

Haroon Chowdry, chief executive of the Centre for Young Lives, said the data was unambiguous. “Young people want to work. They have hopes and ambition, but what they often lack are opportunity and support. Every young NEET is a person who has been let down by the system.”

For the participants themselves, all aged 16 or over, the offer is a five-day, hands-on placement covering the core mechanics of running a restaurant, from inventory checks and drive-thru operations to customer service, all under the supervision of seasoned crew. Tucked alongside the practical experience are sessions on interview technique and time management, the soft-skills currency that small and medium-sized employers across the country routinely complain is missing from CVs.

The programme builds on a body of work that pre-dates the current NEET emergency by some margin. McDonald’s UK & Ireland’s apprenticeship scheme has supported more than 22,000 people in earning degrees since 2006, while community initiatives such as Fun Football and Taste for Work, the latter of which has reached more than 210,000 youngsters, have long formed part of the company’s social investment. Today’s announcement also sees the chain partnering with two of the country’s more influential think tanks. The Centre for Young Lives is publishing a fresh report, Turning the Tide on Rising NEETs, setting out evidence-based policy recommendations, while the Institute for Public Policy Research (IPPR) is embarking on a two-year research programme, State of a Generation.

For a government that has staked political capital on its Youth Guarantee, a pledge to get every young person earning or learning, the McDonald’s intervention is timely. Whether other large employers can be persuaded to write similarly sizeable cheques remains the open question. As Milburn put it, this is the “kind of leadership employers need to demonstrate if we’re serious about giving every young person a fair start.”

For SME owners watching from the sidelines, the message is harder to ignore. The talent is there. So is the appetite. What has been missing, until now, is a door wide enough to let them through.

Read more:
MDdonald’s bets on Britain’s youth with UK’s biggest paid work experience scheme