Business

Baroness Michelle Mone has been permitted to retain rental income of up to £15,000 a week from a luxury London mansion, despite the property being subject to a court-ordered asset freeze linked to the £148 million PPE Medpro scandal.

A judge has approved an amendment to an existing freezing order, allowing rental proceeds from a £25 million Grade II* listed property in Chester Square, Belgravia, to be kept while criminal and civil investigations continue. The property may be rented out but cannot be sold.

The mansion is owned via an Isle of Man-registered company connected to the business empire of Mone’s husband, Doug Barrowman. It was purchased for £9.25 million in December 2020, shortly after PPE Medpro, a consortium led by Barrowman, secured a £122 million government contract to supply surgical gowns during the Covid pandemic. The gowns were later ruled unfit for use.

Court documents, seen by The Times, show the ruling was made during a closed hearing at Southwark Crown Court, where Judge Tony Baumgartner stated that rental income from the property “is not restrained and there is no restriction on the use to which this income may be put”.

The Belgravia property has undergone extensive refurbishment, including the addition of a cinema room, spa facilities and a basement level. It has previously been marketed with an asking price of £25 million.

The amended order forms part of a wider £75 million asset freeze imposed in 2023 while the National Crime Agency investigates the PPE Medpro deal. PPE Medpro was ordered to repay £148 million to the Department of Health and Social Care after losing a High Court case last year, but entered administration the day before the judgment was handed down.

In separate rulings, Mone and Barrowman have also been allowed to rent out multiple other UK properties held via offshore companies, including assets in Glasgow and the Isle of Man. Income from those properties is not restricted, although proceeds from any approved sales must be held under legal supervision.

Other assets covered by the freeze include bank accounts at Coutts, C Hoare & Co and Goldman Sachs, as well as a 39-metre superyacht, Lady M. The order does not extend to a £41 million villa in St Barts or a reported $12.5 million property in Miami.

Barrowman is reported to have received at least £65 million from PPE Medpro, including £29 million transferred into a trust for the benefit of Mone and her children.

Legal experts have previously warned that the government’s ability to recover funds will depend on whether liquidators pursue directors and beneficial owners, a process that could take years and involve significant cost.

Read more:
Baroness Mone allowed to keep £15,000-a-week rent from Belgravia mansion amid PPE investigation

China’s electric vehicle champion BYD is on course to overtake Tesla as the world’s biggest seller of battery-electric cars, marking a symbolic shift in the global EV race.

The Shenzhen-based group said annual sales of its battery-powered vehicles jumped by almost 28 per cent last year to more than 2.25 million units. By contrast, Tesla is expected to report full-year sales of around 1.65 million vehicles when it releases its 2025 figures later on Friday, based on analysts’ forecasts published last week.

If confirmed, it would be the first time BYD has overtaken its American rival on an annual basis, underlining the rapid rise of Chinese manufacturers in a market long dominated by Western brands.

The milestone caps a difficult year for Tesla, which has grappled with a lukewarm reception to newer models, intensifying competition from lower-priced Chinese rivals and growing unease among some consumers and investors over the political activities of its chief executive, Elon Musk.

Chinese carmakers including BYD, Geely and MG have steadily eroded Tesla’s market share by offering well-specified electric cars at significantly lower prices. In response, Tesla launched cheaper versions of its two best-selling models in the US in October in a bid to reignite demand.

Sales at Tesla slumped in the first quarter of 2025 after a backlash linked to Musk’s role in President Donald Trump’s administration, prompting concerns that his focus was being stretched across too many ventures. Musk later pledged to “significantly” scale back his government involvement.

Despite fierce competition in its home market, which slowed BYD’s sales growth to the weakest pace in five years, the company continues to expand aggressively overseas. It has gained traction across Latin America, South East Asia and parts of Europe, even as governments impose tariffs on Chinese-made EVs.

In October, BYD said the UK had become its largest market outside China, with sales surging 880 per cent year-on-year to the end of September. Demand has been driven in part by the plug-in hybrid version of its Seal U SUV, which has resonated with British buyers seeking lower-emission vehicles without full range anxiety.

While Tesla remains one of the world’s most valuable carmakers, its lead in the electric vehicle market is narrowing as rivals catch up on technology, scale and pricing. For BYD, overtaking Tesla would cement its status as the world’s leading EV producer — and highlight how decisively China has reshaped the global automotive industry.

The question now is whether Tesla can regain momentum through new products such as its Optimus humanoid robot and self-driving “robotaxi” ambitions, or whether BYD’s cost advantage and manufacturing scale will keep it firmly in the lead.

Read more:
China’s BYD set to overtake Tesla as world’s top electric vehicle seller

London taxi fares are set to rise after the government moved to close a long-standing VAT loophole used by ride-hailing platforms, a decision expected to raise around £700 million a year for the Exchequer.

The change, announced by Chancellor Rachel Reeves in November’s Budget, will hit companies such as Uber and Bolt, which have previously used a tax scheme intended for tour operators to reduce their VAT bills.

Ministers argue the move will level the playing field for London’s black cab drivers, while Uber has warned it will result in higher prices for passengers in the capital.

At the centre of the dispute is the tour operators’ margin scheme, which allows eligible businesses to pay VAT only on their profit margin rather than the full value of a service. Originally designed for holiday and coach tour companies, the scheme has also been used by ride-hailing platforms.

According to the Treasury, this reduced the effective VAT rate paid by some operators to as little as 4%, compared with the standard 20% rate. Under the new rules, suppliers of private hire vehicle and taxi services will be excluded from the scheme.

The government has branded the move the end of an “illegitimate” tax advantage, while critics have dubbed it a new “taxi tax”.

The impact will be felt most sharply in London because of rules set by Transport for London, which require ride-hailing firms to act as the principal in transactions rather than as booking agents.

Outside the capital, Uber has moved to clarify that it operates as an agent, meaning VAT is only charged on the commission it earns, with drivers treated as the supplier of transport services. Most drivers fall below the VAT registration threshold, limiting overall tax exposure.

That structure is not permitted in London, leaving operators exposed to VAT on the full fare.

Reeves said: “We’re putting the brakes on the illegitimate use of a niche tax scheme to protect everyday cabbies. The £700 million a year this raises will help us cut the cost of living, cut waiting lists and cut debt and borrowing.”

Steve McNamara, general secretary of the Licensed Taxi Drivers Association, welcomed the change, calling it “a landmark step for fairness and integrity”.

“For too long, drivers and small operators paying the full 20% VAT have had to compete with online minicab firms benefiting from a niche tax scheme,” he said.

Uber, however, has warned the move will have unintended consequences. Andrew Brem, head of Uber UK, previously said the change would “mean higher prices for passengers in London, and less work for drivers, at a time when people are already struggling with the cost of living”.

He also criticised the creation of a two-tier system, where journeys in London are taxed differently from those elsewhere in the UK.

With fares expected to rise and political pressure mounting on the cost of living, the closure of the VAT loophole is set to become another flashpoint in the ongoing battle between government, gig-economy platforms and traditional taxi operators.

Read more:
Uber and Bolt warn London fares will rise as ‘taxi tax’ loophole closes

Ikea is accelerating its shift towards smaller city-centre stores in Britain, as rising property taxes and changing shopping habits blunt the appeal of traditional out-of-town megastores.

Peter Jelkeby, the outgoing chief executive of Ikea UK and Ireland, said the Swedish retailer would focus future expansion on compact urban formats after strong trading at its new Oxford Street flagship and central Brighton store.

The strategy represents a clear move away from Ikea’s historic “big box” warehouse model, which dominated retail parks for decades and defined the brand’s British expansion from the late 1980s onwards.

While the group has no immediate plans to close existing large stores, Jelkeby confirmed that Ikea does not intend to open any new megastores in the UK.

“We see more potential in opening more smaller stores like Oxford Street and Hammersmith,” he said. “That’s where customers are, and that’s where growth is.”

Jelkeby acknowledged that the rising cost of business rates has played a role in the strategic rethink. Larger retail units typically attract far higher rateable values, leaving operators exposed to disproportionately large tax bills.

Upcoming reforms will intensify that pressure further, with a new surcharge on commercial properties with a rateable value above £500,000. While intended to support smaller businesses, the changes will increase the burden on supermarkets, department stores and warehouse-style retailers.

“We of course want to have lower business rates,” Jelkeby said, adding that reform needs to “come sooner rather than later so the climate for retail can be positive”.

Alongside its city-centre push, Ikea is also experimenting with mid-sized stores in retail parks that sit between its smallest urban outlets and traditional megastores. New sites in Harlow, Norwich and Chester reflect what Jelkeby described as a more flexible approach to bricks-and-mortar retail.

Ikea believes it now has “enough big box” locations across the UK and Ireland, but will continue investing in those sites by improving fulfilment, click-and-collect and in-store services rather than expanding their footprint.

The retailer closed its Tottenham megastore in north London in 2022 after concluding that central, smaller locations offered greater long-term potential in the capital.

The Oxford Street store, which opened in May, has delivered strong sales across furniture, accessories and food, with demand for its restaurant exceeding forecasts.

“We are learning fast,” Jelkeby said. “We’ve had to increase checkout capacity and scale up food operations to cope with footfall.”

The UK business is owned by the Ingka Group, Ikea’s largest global franchisee. Jelkeby will now move to lead Ikea’s German division, where he plans to explore a similar shift, using the UK as a testing ground.

“Germany is our biggest market and more traditional than the UK,” he said. “Britain has allowed us to trial new ways of meeting customers where they are.”

Read more:
Ikea pivots to city centres as ‘big box’ era stalls in the UK

Beyoncé has officially become a billionaire, according to Forbes, cementing her status as one of the most commercially successful musicians of all time.

The American superstar is now the fifth musician to be recognised by Forbes as having amassed a ten-figure fortune, joining an elite group that includes Taylor Swift, Rihanna, Bruce Springsteen, and her husband Jay-Z, whose net worth Forbes estimates at $2.5bn (£1.85bn).

Earlier this month, Forbes valued Beyoncé at $800m (£593m), but a series of lucrative projects has since pushed her wealth beyond the billion-dollar mark.

A major driver has been her 2023 Renaissance World Tour, which grossed nearly $600m, making it one of the highest-earning tours of the decade. Beyoncé further increased profits by producing and distributing the accompanying concert film herself through a direct deal with AMC Theatres, securing almost half of the film’s $44m (£33m) global box office takings.

Her momentum continued in 2024 with the release of Cowboy Carter, an album celebrating the Black roots of country music. The project received widespread critical acclaim and won Album of the Year at the Grammy Awards, the first time Beyoncé has claimed the top prize, despite four previous nominations.

The accompanying Cowboy Carter tour generated more than $400m in ticket sales, alongside an estimated $50m in merchandise revenue, Forbes said. The tour featured appearances from Jay-Z, two of the couple’s three children, and former Destiny’s Child bandmates.

While the tour broke ticket records at London’s Tottenham Hotspur Stadium and the Stade de France in Paris, it also faced uneven demand, with some promoters cutting prices to fill seats. Even so, Beyoncé commanded the highest top-priced ticket of any UK artist in 2025, with premium seats reaching £950, while entry-level tickets started at £71.

Additional income streams included a high-profile Netflix halftime show on Christmas Day, estimated to have earned $50m, alongside a further $10m from a series of Levi’s advertising campaigns.

Elsewhere, Bloomberg has listed Selena Gomez as a billionaire, citing a net worth of $1.3bn (£962m). Forbes disputes that assessment, instead valuing Gomez at around $700m (£518m).

For Beyoncé, however, the numbers are now beyond dispute, placing her firmly among the world’s wealthiest entertainers and underscoring the growing power of artists who control not just their music, but their tours, films and brands.

Read more:
Beyoncé declared a billionaire by Forbes after record tours and brand deals

The ambition to turn the Oxford–Cambridge corridor into “Europe’s Silicon Valley” is in danger of stalling unless the government accelerates delivery of long-promised infrastructure, business leaders have warned.

A coalition of major companies, universities and investors has written to Rachel Reeves urging faster progress on transport and planning commitments for the so-called OxCam supercluster, amid growing concern that delays to the East West Rail project are undermining investor confidence.

The warning comes in a report from the Oxford-Cambridge Supercluster, backed by 46 organisations including AstraZeneca, GSK, Airbus and the Ellison Institute of Technology Oxford, founded by US tech billionaire Larry Ellison.

The corridor has been championed by the chancellor as a cornerstone of Labour’s growth strategy, with ministers promising to unlock a projected £78bn boost to the UK economy by 2035 through science, technology and life sciences expansion.

However, the report warns that uncertainty over infrastructure delivery — particularly the East West Rail (EWR) line — risks blunting that potential.

The East West Rail scheme, designed to connect Oxford and Cambridge via Milton Keynes and Bedford, is widely seen as critical to turning the region into a single integrated labour and innovation market.

But concerns are mounting that the project is slipping behind schedule. Industry leaders fear the required development consent order may not be submitted until 2027, meaning final approval could fall beyond the current parliament — putting the government’s 2035 operational target at risk.

Andy Williams, chair of the Oxford-Cambridge Supercluster board and a former senior AstraZeneca executive, said the lack of certainty was already harming confidence.

“Without clarity and pace, we risk killing investor confidence,” he said, warning that trains may not run the full route by 2035 unless action is taken quickly.

The corridor has regained political momentum after being deprioritised under Boris Johnson’s government, when regional “levelling up” became the focus. Business leaders have welcomed Labour’s renewed attention, but say ambition must now be matched by execution.

While the government committed £2.5bn in June’s spending review to progress East West Rail, the report argues that funding alone is not enough without a clear, region-wide delivery plan.

The government has taken some steps, including approving the reopening of the Cowley branch line in Oxford and appointing Lord Vallance as the corridor’s growth champion. Ministers have also promised a more detailed plan this year.

But the report calls for stronger governance across the entire region, alongside an overarching spatial strategy setting out where housing, laboratories and commercial space will be prioritised — and how supporting infrastructure will be delivered.

The report, produced with the Centre for Business Research at the University of Cambridge, shows that economic growth is already spreading beyond Oxford and Cambridge into places such as Milton Keynes and Stevenage, home to a major GSK research site.

The corridor now hosts around 3,000 knowledge-intensive firms, employing 152,000 people and generating £45bn in annual revenues. Employment growth has outpaced the UK average over the past decade.

Shaun Grady, chair of AstraZeneca UK, said East West Rail was “vital infrastructure” needed to connect campuses, labs and cities into a single talent market and ensure scientific advances translate into economic growth more quickly.

Nick Pettit, senior partner at property adviser Bidwells, added that the rail link was the “missing piece” and said the government must provide planning certainty and accelerate delivery of housing and workspace along the route.

A Department for Transport spokesperson said East West Rail remained a “catalyst for growth”, adding that officials were examining how recent planning reforms could be used to deliver benefits sooner.

If completed, the line is expected to cut journey times between Oxford and Cambridge from around three hours to just over 90 minutes — a transformation businesses say is essential if the UK is serious about building a globally competitive innovation corridor.

Read more:
Dream of ‘Europe’s Silicon Valley’ at risk as ministers urged to move faster on OxCam rail link

The upmarket fashion retailer LK Bennett is on the brink of collapse for the second time in six years after filing an application to appoint administrators.

Court filings show the business submitted papers to the High Court on Tuesday, signalling that efforts to secure fresh funding or a buyer may have failed. The move puts around 280 jobs at risk across the group.

Founded in 1990 by Linda Bennett, LK Bennett became synonymous with polished British style and built a loyal following that included senior politicians and members of the royal family. However, the brand has struggled to regain financial stability since its first insolvency in 2019.

In its previous collapse, LK Bennett fell into administration after failing to secure new investment and was subsequently acquired out of insolvency by its Chinese franchise partner, Rebecca Feng. That deal followed a competitive process in which she beat rival interest from Mike Ashley, founder of Sports Direct.

Despite the rescue, the retailer has continued to face mounting pressure from rising costs, weak discretionary spending and structural changes in the fashion sector.

The business currently lists just nine standalone UK stores, alongside 13 concessions across the UK, Ireland and Jersey, reflecting a significantly reduced physical footprint.

According to LK Bennett’s most recent accounts, covering trading up to the end of January 2024, the company reported losses of £3.2 million and borrowings of almost £22 million.

Auditors Grant Thornton raised a red flag over the company’s future, warning of a “material uncertainty related to going concern”. The accounts disclosed that LK Bennett had breached agreements with its lenders and faced a deadline to renegotiate its debt facilities.

While the auditor noted that the company had received a letter from its bank indicating an intention to continue providing facilities until at least January 2026, it also confirmed that no formal covenant waiver had been secured, leaving the business exposed.

The fate of LK Bennett has been closely watched across the fashion industry in the run-up to Christmas, with hopes that seasonal trading might stabilise cash flow or attract a buyer. The decision to seek administrators suggests those efforts have not delivered the turnaround required.

If administrators are formally appointed, it will mark another high-profile casualty on the UK high street as fashion brands continue to struggle with subdued consumer demand, rising rents, wage costs and the shift towards online shopping.

LK Bennett has been approached for comment.

Read more:
Fashion brand LK Bennett on brink of collapse for second time putting upto 280 jobs at risk

UK ministers are facing renewed pressure to tighten restrictions on gambling advertising, after new polling revealed strong public support for a far tougher approach to promotions and sponsorship.

Gambling regulation has been the subject of increasingly heated debate in recent years, with governments introducing tighter controls on online slots, higher industry taxes and a statutory levy to fund addiction treatment. However, advertising rules have remained largely untouched, despite the scale of promotional activity rising sharply since market deregulation in 2005.

Polling conducted by More in Common and commissioned by the Campaign to End Gambling Advertising suggests that public tolerance for gambling marketing has now reached a tipping point.

The research, published in a report titled Ending A Losing Streak, found that 70% of respondents support stronger curbs on gambling advertising and sponsorship, while more than a quarter believe gambling firms should not be allowed to advertise at all.

In a foreword to the report, former Conservative party leader Iain Duncan Smith said tougher regulation would be both politically viable and widely supported.

“The report shows that tougher regulation of the gambling sector would not only be uncontroversial but would carry strong public support from voters across the political spectrum,” he said. “If we are to protect the next generation from gambling harm, we must act.”

Labour MPs have also stepped up calls for reform. Beccy Cooper said existing advertising rules were no longer fit for purpose, arguing that promotions now “saturate television, social media and influencer marketing”, exposing children and young people as a matter of course.

Despite stricter regulation elsewhere, gambling advertising has so far avoided major legislative intervention. In 2019, operators agreed a voluntary “whistle-to-whistle” ban on advertising during live sports broadcasts before 9pm, alongside a commitment that 20% of adverts promote safer gambling messages.

Campaigners argue these measures fall well short of what is needed. Will Prochaska, director of the Campaign to End Gambling Advertising, said the polling shows a clear mandate for action, particularly online.

“This study shows deep public concern about the gambling sector and a strong appetite to protect children from gambling ads,” he said. “We urge the government to start by banning all gambling advertising and content from children’s social media and computer games.”

The gambling industry spends up to £2bn a year on advertising and marketing, according to some estimates, although the Betting & Gaming Council disputes that figure, putting annual spend closer to £1.15bn and arguing higher estimates include illegal operators.

The BGC maintains that advertising already complies with strict guidelines and that there is no proven causal link between exposure to advertising and problem gambling. It has also warned that further restrictions or tax rises could damage the sector and lead to job losses.

A government spokesperson said there are currently no plans to legislate for new advertising restrictions, but acknowledged ongoing concerns.

“We recognise that more work needs to be done to ensure that gambling advertising does not lead to harmful gambling,” the spokesperson said. “We are working closely, across government and with industry, to ensure children and the most vulnerable are protected, and to tackle illegal gambling advertising.”

The polling suggests gambling is now the industry voters most want to see regulated more tightly, ahead of technology, artificial intelligence, finance and aviation. Only 8% of respondents said they would like the gambling industry to grow, while nearly half said they would prefer it to shrink.

Concerns also extend to physical gambling venues. Asked whether they would prefer an empty shop or a gambling venue on their local high street, 44% chose an empty unit, compared with just 27% who favoured a betting shop or arcade.

As political pressure builds and public opinion hardens, ministers may find it increasingly difficult to resist calls for a more restrictive advertising regime in the year ahead.

Read more:
UK ministers face mounting pressure to restrict gambling advertising

The UK motor finance arm of Mercedes-Benz has plunged into a £365 million loss after setting aside hundreds of millions of pounds to cover potential compensation linked to the mis-selling of car loans.

Accounts filed for Mercedes-Benz Financial Services UK, based in Milton Keynes, show the business swung to a £364.6 million loss in 2024, compared with a £69.6 million profit the previous year, after booking additional charges related to improperly disclosed commission arrangements.

The provision of £423.8 million is the largest disclosed so far by any car manufacturer, underlining the growing financial impact of the motor finance redress scandal, which Financial Conduct Authority estimates could cost the industry around £11 billion.

The FCA said in October that millions of motorists could be entitled to compensation averaging about £700 per agreement, after finding that lenders and brokers failed to properly disclose commission payments on car finance deals stretching back to April 2007.

While the regulator has proposed a sector-wide redress scheme, lenders and finance providers have mounted a fierce backlash, arguing that the scale of compensation is disproportionate. The FCA’s consultation closed last month, with final rules expected in February or March. Legal action remains possible if firms challenge the outcome.

Mercedes-Benz revealed in October that it had already set aside €422 million (£368 million) at group level. The latest UK accounts show a £395 million charge taken in 2024 alone, on top of £28.8 million previously reserved, bringing the total UK provision to £423.8 million.

Mercedes is not alone in facing a substantial hit. Lloyds Banking Group has earmarked £1.95 billion to cover potential redress costs, while BMW Financial Services UK has set aside nearly £207 million.

The scale of Mercedes-Benz Financial Services UK’s loss highlights how deeply embedded motor finance commissions were across the industry, and how costly the fallout may yet become.

As the regulator prepares to finalise its redress framework, the episode is shaping up as one of the most significant consumer finance scandals in recent UK history, with far-reaching consequences for banks, carmakers and borrowers alike.

Read more:
Mercedes-Benz Financial Services UK posts £365m loss after car loan scandal provision

As 2026 approaches, more and more cryptocurrency users are no longer waiting for price surges, but instead turning to models that offer visible daily returns.

At CryptoMiningFirm, multi-currency cloud mining is now running at scale.

By running BTC, XRP, ETH, and DOGE simultaneously, some active high-hashrate contracts can generate up to $9,000 worth of real profits in BTC, XRP, ETH, DOGE, and other cryptocurrencies daily.

These are not projections or market assumptions — they are results from contracts currently running and settling every day.

Real daily earnings from an active CryptoMiningFirm user account

Generated by live multi-currency cloud mining contracts

To allow users to witness this process firsthand, CryptoMiningFirm offers new users an immediate reward of $10 to $100 upon registration—which can be used to activate a live mining contract and observe real daily earnings.

Why are more users choosing to register now?

Because without registering, there’s no way to see whether these daily returns are already happening.

After signing up, users can immediately observe:

Whether the bonus is credited
Whether the mining contract is actively running
Whether earnings are settled daily

No price predictions
No upfront commitment
Just real daily data

Multi-Currency Mining: From Price Waiting to Daily Settlement

Unlike single-asset mining, CryptoMiningFirm runs BTC, XRP, ETH, and DOGE simultaneously.

The system automatically allocates hashrate based on network conditions, turning volatile market exposure into a steady daily settlement structure.

For many users, this means:

No frequent trading

No constant decisions

Just hashrate running quietly in the background

Cloud Mining Is a Progression — Not a One-Time Bet

Trial Stage

Activate a contract with the bonus or a small amount and watch daily settlements.

Contract Type
Daily Rate ($)
Duration (days)
Cost ($)
Total ($)

Antminer T21
4
2
100
108

Iceriver KAS KS7
7.15
5
500
585.75

Growth Stage

Scale computing power as results become consistent and predictable.

Contract Type
Daily Rate ($)
Duration (days)
Cost ($)
Total ($)

ETCMiner E11
35
10
2500
2850

MicroBTWhatsMiner M66S++
77.5
15
5000
6162.5

Antminer S21 XPHYD
175
25
10000
14375

Expansion Stage
Multi-currency coordination aiming for 5,000 XRP-level daily settlements.

Contract Type
Daily Rate ($)
Duration (days)
Cost ($)
Total ($)

ANTSPACE HW5
975
38
50000
87050

ANTSPACE MD5
1640
45
80000
153800

Mining Box-40ft-CE
9450
30
270000
553500

Almost every high-level user started with a simple trial.

Once activated, contracts run automatically — no technical knowledge or manual operation required.

Real User Experiences

James R. (USA)
“I started with the bonus just to see if the system really settled daily. After a few days of consistent results, upgrading felt like a natural decision.”

Maria L. (Spain)
“What surprised me most was the time freedom. After activation, I only check results briefly each day — the rest runs on its own.”

How to Start — Just 3 Simple Steps

Register and receive a $10–$100 bonus
2. Activate a trial cloud mining contract
3. Watch daily settlements, then decide whether to scale

Withdraw, reinvest, or upgrade anytime.

Final Thought

As 2026 approaches, the real advantage isn’t who reads more about crypto —
it’s who has already seen daily settlements with their own account.

CryptoMiningFirm lets users start with experience, not promises.

Register now — observe real daily returns before deciding whether to scale.

Read more:
Looking Ahead to 2026: How CryptoMiningFirm’s Multi-Currency Cloud Mining Achieves Daily Returns of 5,000 XRP