Business

Donald Trump has launched an extraordinary attack on America’s largest defence contractors, threatening to block dividends and share buybacks unless they accelerate weapons production, as he prepares a dramatic expansion of US military spending.

In a post on his Truth Social platform, the US president warned defence firms that he would no longer tolerate what he described as sluggish delivery of military equipment during “troubled and dangerous times”. His comments came ahead of plans to increase the US defence budget for 2027 by 50 per cent, taking annual military spending to $1.5 trillion.

Trump accused defence executives of prioritising shareholder returns and personal remuneration over national security, describing pay packages across the sector as “exorbitant and unjustifiable”. He suggested executive compensation should be capped at $5 million and said companies should redirect capital currently used for dividends and share buybacks into boosting production capacity.

“Military equipment is not being made fast enough,” Trump wrote. “It must be built now with the dividends, stock buybacks and over-compensation of executives, rather than borrowing from financial institutions or getting the money from your government.”

The remarks marked a rare and direct presidential intervention in capital allocation decisions on Wall Street. US defence stocks initially fell sharply in response. Shares in Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, RTX and General Dynamics all declined during afternoon trading. Losses were later pared back after Trump confirmed his intention to significantly raise defence spending.

Trump singled out Raytheon, a subsidiary of RTX, accusing it of being “the least responsive to the needs of the Department of War”. He warned that if the company wanted future government contracts, it would be barred from carrying out further share buybacks.

The president did not clarify how such restrictions would be enforced, raising questions over the legal and regulatory mechanisms available to the White House. Analysts noted that buybacks and dividends are deeply embedded in the financial strategies of established defence firms, many of which rely on consistent shareholder returns to support their valuations.

Lockheed Martin, for example, raised its dividend for the 23rd consecutive year in October to $3.45 per share, while also authorising up to $2 billion in share repurchases, taking its total buyback commitment to more than $9 billion.

Trump’s criticism comes amid long-running concerns over delays and cost overruns in major US defence programmes. Lockheed’s F-35 fighter jet, one of the most expensive weapons systems ever developed, has faced repeated schedule slippages and rising costs. Meanwhile, Northrop Grumman’s Sentinel intercontinental ballistic missile programme, intended to replace the ageing Minuteman III system, is now projected to be 81 per cent over budget, according to the US military.

Neither Lockheed Martin nor Northrop Grumman responded to requests for comment.

For defence investors and contractors alike, Trump’s intervention underlines the growing political risk surrounding the sector, even as government spending is set to rise sharply. While a larger military budget promises long-term revenue growth, tighter scrutiny over executive pay, capital returns and delivery timelines could fundamentally reshape how defence firms operate in the years ahead.

Read more:
Trump threatens defence firms over slow weapons production

UK housebuilding has fallen to its weakest level since the Covid-19 lockdowns of 2020, underlining the scale of the challenge facing ministers as they attempt to revive construction and meet housing targets.

New data from S&P Global shows activity across the UK construction sector continued to shrink in December, with housing and commercial construction work both contracting at the fastest pace in more than four years.

The survey of purchasing managers found that housebuilding and commercial construction declined at their sharpest rate since May 2020, when building sites were forced to shut during the first national lockdown. Civil engineering activity also fell, although at a slower pace than in November.

Overall, the UK construction Purchasing Managers’ Index (PMI) edged up slightly to 40.1 in December, from 39.4 the previous month. However, the reading remains well below the 50 mark that separates growth from contraction, signalling another month of falling activity.

The downturn has now stretched to 12 consecutive months, making it the longest unbroken period of contraction in the construction sector since the global financial crisis of 2007–09.

S&P Global said fragile client confidence continued to weigh heavily on workloads, with many firms reporting that investment decisions had been delayed in the run-up to November’s Budget. Although some of that uncertainty has now lifted, the knock-on effect is still being felt in weak order books.

There were, however, early signs of stabilisation. Business expectations for the year ahead rose to a five-month high in December, suggesting that confidence may be starting to recover as policy clarity improves.

Tim Moore, economics director at S&P Global Market Intelligence, said: “UK construction companies once again reported challenging business conditions and falling workloads in December, but the speed of the downturn moderated from the five-and-a-half-year record seen in November. Many firms cited subdued demand and fragile client confidence. Despite a lifting of Budget-related uncertainty, delayed spending decisions were still contributing to weak sales pipelines at the close of the year.

“By sector, the fastest reductions in activity were seen in housing and commercial construction since May 2020, while civil engineering recorded a slower pace of decline.”

The data adds to concerns that the government’s ambitions to accelerate housebuilding and expand social housing remain at risk, particularly while high interest rates, weak developer confidence and constrained investment continue to hold back new projects.

Read more:
UK housebuilding sinks to deepest slump since Covid lockdowns

Sir Stelios Haji-Ioannou, the entrepreneur behind easyJet, is offering ambitious young business owners the chance to secure up to £150,000 in funding as the third annual Stelios Awards for Young Entrepreneurs officially open in the UK.

More than 30 years after founding easyJet at the age of just 27, Sir Stelios has built an “easy” brand empire spanning more than 200 businesses, from budget airlines and hotels to storage, shipping and retail. Now, through the Stelios Philanthropic Foundation, he is backing the next generation of founders with £300,000 in cash grants designed to help scale high-growth UK start-ups.

The overall winner will receive £150,000, with second and third prizes of £100,000 and £50,000 respectively. Unlike many awards and competitions, the payments are cash grants rather than equity investments or loans, allowing founders to retain full control of their businesses.

“This is part of my way of giving back to society,” Sir Stelios said. “I want to encourage young entrepreneurs aged 34 or under to create and grow start-ups in the UK, which to my mind is the best way to generate new jobs and spread prosperity.”

The competition is open to founders aged 34 or under who own and run UK-registered businesses generating at least £500,000 in annual revenue. The threshold has been raised from £200,000 in previous years after a surge in high-quality applications, with 180 entries submitted in the last round alone.

Sir Stelios said he would be focusing on fundamentals rather than hype. “It will be the numbers – is it a good profitable business, is it growing and does it employ lots of people?” he said. “Due to my own background, I would rather reward consumer-facing businesses because they are more relatable and better known.”

Last year’s winner, Ayan Mohamed, exemplifies the kind of entrepreneurial drive the awards aim to support. She founded Digitech Oasis, a Manchester-based company providing autonomous robotic solutions, after teaching herself to code while studying business at university. The prize money helped accelerate growth and create new jobs in the region.

“These awards are incredibly useful to a young British entrepreneur like me,” Mohamed said. “The funding has been vital, but the recognition and credibility that comes with being associated with Sir Stelios has also been a huge boost.”

Beyond the financial support, winners also gain something harder to quantify: access to Sir Stelios himself. He remains actively involved with previous winners, offering mentoring and advice as they scale.

“I am available to them and happy to help,” he said. “It’s very rewarding to see what founders do with the money – and it’s a two-way learning process. Young entrepreneurs know things I don’t, especially about social media.”

Applications close on 23 February 2026, with winners to be announced at a hybrid ceremony in London on 31 March 2026. Sir Stelios has a simple message for potential applicants: “You should apply. This is not just a medal, it’s real money that will help your business.”

Read more:
Young entrepreneurs invited to pitch for £150,000 prize from easyJet founder Sir Stelios

Elon Musk’s artificial intelligence company xAI has secured $20bn (£15.7bn) in fresh funding, pressing ahead with its expansion plans even as its flagship chatbot, Grok, faces intensifying global scrutiny over the creation of sexualised and non-consensual images of women and children.

The Series E funding round, announced on Tuesday, exceeded xAI’s initial $15bn target and attracted heavyweight backers including Nvidia, Fidelity, Qatar’s sovereign wealth fund and Valor Equity Partners, the private investment firm run by Antonio Gracias, a long-time Musk ally.

In its announcement, xAI highlighted Grok’s image-generation capabilities as a core part of its technological proposition — a move that has raised eyebrows given the controversy now engulfing the platform.

While xAI lacks the brand recognition of rivals such as OpenAI, the maker of ChatGPT, it has nonetheless continued to attract significant capital and government contracts amid the global AI investment boom. That momentum has persisted despite repeated criticism over Grok’s output, including allegations of misinformation, antisemitic content and now potentially illegal sexual imagery.

Over recent days, Grok has responded to tens of thousands of prompts on Musk-owned platform X requesting the digital removal of women’s clothing or the creation of sexualised images without consent. Among those targeted was Ashley St Clair, the estranged mother of one of Musk’s children, who said complaints made to the platform went unanswered.

“I felt horrified and violated,” she said, adding that images included personal details visible in the background. Requests for comment sent to xAI reportedly triggered an automated response reading: “Legacy Media Lies.”

More seriously, some images generated by Grok reportedly involved minors. In one case, a photo of a 12-year-old girl was manipulated to depict her in swimwear, while other prompts allegedly produced sexualised images involving children as young as ten. Although Grok issued a public apology last week citing failures in its safeguards, further examples continued to surface afterwards.

The controversy has prompted swift international reaction. French ministers have referred Grok’s output to prosecutors and EU media regulators to assess whether it breaches the bloc’s Digital Services Act. In the UK, Technology Secretary Liz Kendall described the images as “appalling and unacceptable” and called on Ofcom to investigate. Ofcom confirmed it has contacted xAI to determine whether formal action is required.

By contrast, US lawmakers — where xAI is headquartered — have so far been relatively quiet, despite mounting calls for tighter oversight of generative AI tools.

The funding round will support xAI’s aggressive expansion, including the build-out of large-scale data centres in Memphis, Tennessee, and further development of its AI models. The company says the capital will help advance its stated mission of “understanding the universe”.

This is not the first time xAI has announced major funding during controversy. Last summer, shortly after Grok posted antisemitic and pro-Nazi content — including referring to itself as “MechaHitler” — the company revealed it had secured a near-$200m contract with the US Department of Defense.

For investors, the episode underlines a growing tension in the AI sector: vast sums of capital continue to flow into frontier technologies, even as regulators, governments and the public struggle to keep pace with their societal and ethical consequences.

Read more:
Elon Musk’s xAI raises $20bn despite mounting backlash over Grok deepfakes

A deed poll is a legal document used in the UK to formally record a change of name. It allows an individual to update their name across official and professional records, including employment documents, payroll systems, and business registrations.

Why name consistency matters in a professional context

In the workplace, consistency of personal details is more than an administrative preference. Employers rely on accurate records for contracts, tax reporting, background checks, and internal systems. A mismatch between names can create unnecessary delays, confusion, or credibility issues, particularly in regulated or senior roles.

How a deed poll supports career progression

Changing your name through a UK deed poll provides a clear and recognised paper trail. Once completed, the document can be used to update records with HMRC, banks, and professional bodies. This ensures that payslips, pension contributions, and employment histories all reflect the same identity, which is especially important when moving between roles or industries.

Professional image and external perception

For freelancers, consultants, and company directors, professional image extends beyond internal HR systems. Client contracts, invoices, and company filings often require exact name matching. Using a deed poll name change helps present a consistent professional identity across Companies House records, banking arrangements, and contractual documents.

Common career-related questions

Can an employer refuse to update records after a deed poll?
Most employers accept a properly executed deed poll as sufficient evidence of a name change, provided it is correctly formatted and supported by identification where required.

Does a deed poll affect payroll, tax, or pension records?

A deed poll allows employers to update payroll systems, pension records, and tax details so they remain consistent with HMRC records. This helps prevent delays in salary payments or discrepancies in contributions.

Will changing my name impact background checks or employment screening?

A name change recorded through a deed poll does not invalidate previous background checks. Employers may link records using National Insurance numbers or prior name references to ensure continuity.

Should I inform my employer before updating other organisations?

In most cases, informing your employer early helps ensure that internal systems, payslips, and workplace records remain consistent while other organisations are updated.

Using a recognised process

If you are wondering how to change your name, organisations such as the UK Deed Poll Office are often referenced as sources of correctly drafted deed poll documents that meet the expectations of UK employers and institutions. Clear wording and proper execution help reduce friction when updating professional records.

Key takeaway

A deed poll name change is not just a personal decision; it plays a practical role in maintaining professional credibility, reducing administrative risk, and ensuring continuity throughout your career.

Read more:
How a Deed Poll Can Impact Your Career Prospects and Professional Image

Donald Trump has claimed that Venezuela will “turn over” between 30 and 50 million barrels of oil to the United States following a US-backed operation that removed President Nicolás Maduro from power.

Posting on social media, the US president said the oil — worth an estimated $2.8bn (£2.1bn) at current market prices, would be sold by the US, with proceeds controlled by him and used “to benefit the people of Venezuela and the United States”.

The remarks came days after Maduro was flown to the US to face long-standing charges related to drug trafficking and weapons offences, and after Delcy Rodríguez was sworn in as Venezuela’s interim president.

Trump also said he expected US oil companies to be “up and running” in Venezuela within 18 months, adding that large-scale American investment would soon flow into the country.

However, energy analysts have poured cold water on the timetable, warning that restoring Venezuela’s oil industry would require tens of billions of dollars and could take a decade or more.

Venezuela holds the world’s largest proven oil reserves, estimated at more than 300 billion barrels, but output has been in long-term decline since the early 2000s due to underinvestment, mismanagement and international sanctions. Its heavy crude is also costly and complex to refine, limiting the number of facilities able to process it.

China, currently the largest buyer of Venezuelan oil, condemned Trump’s comments, describing them as a violation of international law and an infringement of Venezuelan sovereignty. Beijing also criticised reports that Washington is pressing Caracas to sever economic ties with China, Russia, Iran and Cuba in exchange for US investment.

A spokesperson for China’s foreign ministry said cooperation between China and Venezuela was “between two sovereign states” and must be protected under international law.

According to reports by US media, Trump has pushed for an exclusive oil partnership between Washington and Caracas. On Truth Social, he said the oil would be sold at market prices but that the revenue would be overseen directly by the US administration.

Trump argued that increased Venezuelan oil production would help keep global prices down, saying it was “good for the United States” to bring the country back as a major supplier.

Yet US oil majors have been cautious. Chevron, currently the only American oil company operating in Venezuela under a limited licence, said it remained focused on employee safety and regulatory compliance. ConocoPhillips, which exited Venezuela years ago following nationalisation, said it was monitoring developments but that it would be “premature to speculate” on future investments.

Exxon declined to comment.

Venezuela nationalised its oil industry in 1976 and increased state control over foreign-owned assets in 2007 under Hugo Chávez. In 2019, a World Bank tribunal ordered Venezuela to pay ConocoPhillips $8.7bn in compensation for expropriated assets — a sum that remains unpaid.

While Trump and US officials have claimed that Venezuela “stole” American oil, legal experts note that natural resources are owned by sovereign states under international law. US companies historically operated under licence agreements rather than owning the oil itself.

With Venezuela’s infrastructure degraded, sanctions still in flux and political uncertainty high, analysts warn that any meaningful increase in production — and any impact on global oil prices — is unlikely in the near term.

Read more:
Trump claims Venezuela will hand over up to 50m barrels of oil to US after regime change

Recently, one of Italy’s leading publications — Il Giornale — published a piece about the legal dispute between a major Italian engineering group Maire S.p.A. and the swiss-based fertilizer producer EuroChem, which is being heard in several jurisdictions worldwide, including London and Moscow.

The article examined the potential implications of ongoing litigation for Maire’s public disclosures, share price and foreign assets. Several hours after publication, the article was taken down from the newspaper’s website without explanation.

According to market sources, Maire sent letters to Italian media outlets earlier this autumn requesting that they refrain from publishing anything related to the Moscow court proceedings. The company has maintained that rulings issued by Russian courts have no legal force outside Russia and therefore do not represent a material risk to investors.

However, the speed and firmness of Maire’s response have raised questions among observers about how seriously the company views the dispute.

To recall: the conflict is related to the termination of contracts for the construction of a chemical complex in Kingisepp, where work was halted in 2022. EuroChem Severo-Zapad-2, a Russian subsidiary of EuroChem, maintains that obligations were violated due to the contractor’s fault, while Maire S.p.A. claims that the project was terminated as a result of sanctions restrictions and force majeure.

The removed Il Giornale article cited legal experts involved in the case, who suggested that the main issue for Maire may not lie solely in the court proceedings themselves, but in questions of market disclosure.

According to the report, EuroChem has submitted complaints to European financial regulators, including Consob in Italy and the Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier (CSSF) in Luxembourg. The complaints allege that Maire failed to adequately inform the market about the nature and scale of risks associated with the litigation, particularly with regard to its assets in Russia.

Lawyers quoted in the article noted that the Moscow lawsuit was filed as early as September, but does not appear to have been reflected in Maire’s 9M interim financial statements or in documentation related to the group’s recent borrowing activities on European capital markets.

The dispute reportedly involves potential claims amounting to billions of euros. Under European regulatory practice, such exposures may qualify as material information capable of influencing investment decisions and share prices.

The article noted that if these circumstances are confirmed, European regulators may have grounds to require Maire to disclose the risks associated with the court proceedings in greater detail and more clearly, including their potential impact on the company’s financial position and shares. In extreme cases, sanctions may be imposed, but even the mere threat of regulatory review could affect stock prices and complicate the company’s access to financing.

A separate section of the publication was devoted to risks associated with Maire’s assets outside Italy. Despite the company’s statements that Russian court decisions are not enforceable abroad, lawyers pointed to international practice that allows the use of interim measures in third jurisdictions. As an argument, examples of recent cases were cited where decisions of Russian courts became the basis for procedural actions abroad. In 2023–2025, the group significantly expanded its presence in regions where large infrastructure projects are implemented with state participation, and the contractor’s reputational stability is of key importance.

In Kazakhstan, Maire has received contracts worth a total of over $4.5 billion, including projects in the Atyrau region and the Tengiz field. In Saudi Arabia, the group is participating in the expansion of the SATORP complex as part of the Amiral project worth approximately $2 billion, and is also performing service contracts for Saudi Aramco. In China, the company is implementing a number of technology and licensing projects in the fertilizers and polymers sector.

In such markets, timely delivery and reputational stability are considered critical. A high-profile legal dispute may prompt clients and partners to seek additional assurances regarding risk management and corporate governance.

Thus, the main message of the removed article was as follows: the Moscow trial cannot be viewed as a legally isolated episode. It carries regulatory, financial, and reputational risks that potentially should be disclosed to the market. In this context, EuroChem’s position appeared advantageous — the company not only obtained a court decision but also brought the dispute into the realm of European financial supervision.

Maire’s attempt to remove discussion of these circumstances from the public sphere only reinforces the main question posed in the headline of the deleted article: is the Italian engineering giant hiding material risks from its shareholders and investors? Under European regulation, pressure on the media rarely diminishes regulators’ interest — on the contrary, it can become an additional reason for even closer attention.

Read more:
Is a Leading Italian Engineering Group Hiding Risks from Investors and Shareholders?

If you are thinking of recommending daily extensions to your clients, or, as a hair extension lover, you’re prone to wearing clip-ins every single day, then, it may be time to reconsider.

Despite clip-in hair extensions being incredibly practical, adaptable, and classic, particularly for everyday styling, there’s still risks involved. Here in this blog, we’ll be guiding you through the best way to integrate clip in extensions into your weekly routine in a way that’s stylish, practical, and safe for your natural locks. Also, you can explore all of the key ways to wear your clip-ins in more depth in the cliphair guide for how your clip-in extensions can affect your hair, plus all the ways you can maintain healthy hair.

The Short Answer

Clip-ins can be your everyday extensions if you have thick or medium-volume hair. For most hair types, daily use is safe when used with the proper application, removal, and maintenance, but in general, it is not advised. Consider experts’ tips to maintain the best possible condition for both your natural hair and extensions. You can also consider permanent hair extensions, such as tape-ins or nano rings, for a simple everyday option that doesn’t require extensive application. You can save time on your hair routine with these options and can avoid wear and tear to both your natural hair and extensions.

Benefits of Daily Wear

Wearing extensions daily can transform your look and style in a matter of minutes. Primarily, people adore clip-ins because they deliver volume and length instantly, without waiting for trips to the salon. Secondly, you can try different hairstyles every day, including straight, curly, long, or mid-length styles. Lastly, they are popular for being user-friendly, beginner-friendly, and needing no specialised tool or expertise. They can be worn easily and smartly without spending hours in a salon chair. Clip-ins also let you take breaks whenever you want, unlike permanent extensions. Overnight, your hair has downtime.

Potential Concern

To avoid extension damage, we recommend that you follow some essential rules. Firstly, avoid straining your roots by putting clips in the same place; you can change the locations a few times a week and reduce the number of clips to relieve your scalp from stress. Secondly, your extensions need to be washed frequently if you spray or apply serums; however, excessive washing also damages them. Therefore, proper care is necessary to improve their lifespan. Finally, your extension will take up to 10 minutes a day for proper placement, especially if you are a beginner. Time is not usually a concern when it comes to clip-ins.

Best Practices for Daily Wear

If you or your clients are committed to daily wear, adapt the following practices for safe extension wear.

Keep changing your clip position on your scalp to avoid strain on your hair follicles.
Overnight wear is not expert-recommended as it may cause damage from tugging and friction.
Remove your extension for a day or two per week to ensure natural regeneration. This also reduces tension on your follicles and ultimately prevents damage.
Straightening conditioners and nourishing shampoos are a must as they help in improving your hair health.

Signs You Need a Break

Always remember that your natural hair needs to break. Even with permanent extensions, your scalp still needs an extension break. Consider one to two months’ breaks every 12 months before going for the next set. The extension break will heal, regenerate, build, and strengthen your natural hair. After all, you need to prepare carefully for the next set of installations. Pay proper attention to your scalp health and consider deep conditioning, hair treatments, and light styling during that break. Do not wait too long to seek expert advice when discomfort or breakage occurs.

Making Extensions Last

Clip-ins are cost-effective and can last long if properly cared for. Follow simple techniques for the best extension care to prolong their lifespan.

Regular brushing to avoid tangles
Washing gently with cold water, but not too often
Storing them carefully to prevent damage

Your extensions deserve the same care as your natural hair. Treat them well!

Conclusion

So even if you are your own stylist for your clip-in extensions or have a large salon clientele, understanding sustainability will help ensure the longevity of your extensions. Safe hair procedures will include preparation, installation, cleaning, storage, and maintenance, which are key to better outcomes. And finally, your hair follicles and scalp need rest to regenerate before the next set of placements.

Read more:
Can You Wear Clip-In Extensions Daily? The Truth

Regulatory compliance is a core part of business operations for companies in every sector. Organisations must keep up with a growing set of rules that cover data protection, workplace safety, and more.

However, many businesses still find it difficult to create a culture where compliance is prioritised as an everyday practice rather than just a requirement.

Building a company culture that truly aligns with regulatory standards takes careful planning and ongoing effort. When employees understand what rules apply and why they matter, compliance becomes part of daily routines. A strong training approach can help bridge this gap, turning regulations into practical actions that staff can follow at work.

This approach is supported by industry best practices, which highlight the need for clear communication and regular training to support a compliance-focused company culture across all levels of the business.

Why Regulatory Compliance Must Be Part of Company DNA

Financial penalties for non-compliance can be serious, but the broader impact includes reputational damage and loss of customer trust. While headline-grabbing fines are a risk, the real cost often comes from operational disruption and lost opportunities. That’s why UK businesses are moving away from a checklist mentality and towards a culture of compliance.

Many are now using a compliance training system to make regulatory awareness part of their organisational culture. This shift means policies are part of daily work, with responsibility shared across teams. Integrated training ensures staff know the rules and how to apply them, which helps reduce mistakes.

Key regulatory frameworks for UK businesses include GDPR for data protection, FCA rules for financial services, and Health and Safety Executive standards for workplace safety. Each framework has specific requirements that affect business operations.

The business case for a proactive approach is compelling. Companies with strong compliance cultures often experience greater trust from stakeholders, fewer disruptions, and may be better positioned to win contracts that require proof of compliance.

Building Blocks of a Compliance-Focused Culture

Developing a compliance-focused culture depends on leadership. When senior leaders model compliant behaviours and talk openly about regulatory standards, employees are more likely to follow suit. This commitment must be visible and genuine, with executives following the same rules as everyone else.

Clear communication about what is expected is important at every level. Staff need to know which rules apply to their role and why those rules matter. This means translating complicated regulations into plain language that connects to real work situations.

Forward-thinking organisations include compliance in performance reviews and recognition programmes. When regulatory standards form part of how employee performance is measured, it sends a clear message that compliance is a business priority.

Training Approaches That Shape Compliance Attitudes

Traditional compliance training often focuses on memorising rules, which does not always lead to behaviour change. Employees may complete required courses but fail to apply what they have learned. This gap can reduce the impact of compliance programmes.

Scenario-based learning is considered a more effective approach. When employees work through realistic situations that reflect their actual job challenges, they build practical skills they can use right away. This method connects regulations with real workplace decisions.

Microlearning breaks compliance content into short, focused segments that are easier to absorb. These brief learning moments can make compliance topics more manageable and support higher engagement than traditional long sessions.

Gamification features such as points, badges, and leaderboards may also boost engagement with compliance content. Personalised learning paths help ensure staff receive the most relevant training for their roles.

Measuring Training Effectiveness

Evaluating compliance training goes beyond tracking completion rates. Organisations can assess knowledge retention with follow-up quizzes and monitor behaviour changes through observation. Linking training engagement with a reduction in compliance incidents may provide a clearer picture of what works.

Analytics from training systems can show knowledge gaps across departments or job roles. These findings help organisations target extra training where it will have the most effect on reducing compliance risks.

Technology as a Compliance Culture Support Tool

Compliance management has shifted from paper-based systems to advanced digital platforms. This development has made compliance more accessible and a natural part of regular operations. Automation now handles tasks like paperwork, reminders, and record-keeping.

Modern compliance systems bring training directly into daily routines. Rather than pulling employees away from their work, these systems deliver guidance when it is needed. Immediate regulatory updates are another important benefit.

The use of mobile learning, real-time reporting, and personalised content is becoming common for compliance training platforms that make regulatory knowledge accessible for all employees.

Maintaining Progress in Regulatory Compliance

Ongoing improvement is necessary for keeping compliance programmes effective. Regular reviews of processes, along with staff feedback, help identify gaps and adjust strategies to fit each organisation’s needs.

Compliance communications benefit from frequent updates. Changing delivery channels, using timely examples, and involving different internal messengers can help keep messages fresh and engaging.

Employee involvement can increase commitment and the likelihood that new policies will be accepted. Inviting staff to help develop compliance solutions may lead to stronger ownership of standards.

Building connections with regulators and industry groups helps UK companies stay updated on guidelines. These partnerships can lower the risk of missing key changes and bring in new ideas that fit the business environment.

Read more:
Creating a Company Culture That Embraces Regulatory Standards

Clip-in hair extensions last longer, but if this happens, you can smartly prevent extension slipping. The strategy is how well you care for them and how often you wear them.

Clip-ins last up to 12 months with proper care. For everything you need to know, we suggest you read the Cliphair guide when installing, removing, and storing your extensions if you want them to last a long time. When you handle them carefully and store them properly, you can get a full year of use from their clip-in extensions.

Why Extensions Slip

You might not notice it often, but you can easily prevent clip-in extensions from slipping. In this guide, we will help you explore the reasons why extensions slip and possible solutions to keep them in place. Here’s some of the reasons your extensions may be falling out:

Your hair becomes slippery due to heavy styling products. The best you can do is to reduce the product’s usage or try lighter solutions.
The natural oils in your hair can sometimes make your extensions slip. Use dry shampoo or wash more often.
Dry shampooing the roots or gently teasing them to build hold for the clips might help prevent sliding caused by extremely soft, fine hair.
Your extensions will not survive long if they are not properly positioned or clipped. Make sure you pay great attention to the application instructions.

Prep Your Hair Properly

Correct extension prep is necessary before applying your extensions. You can use a texturising product or dry shampoo before placing the extensions. The best way to prevent slipping is to give your hair more traction during the day, which will also provide you with a smoother, more voluminous look. You can gently massage your hair at the roots where you have attached the clips, and this will improve the grip. The texturising products will provide a refined finish on even, smooth and recently washed hair. The product will firmly grip your hair and will prevent slipping.

Placement Techniques

For a smooth and refined blend with clip-in hair extensions, it is important to section the hair from the mid region properly to the crown and secure it with clips. Wearing extensions without sectioning can cause slippage and tangles, damaging the scalp and hair roots. It is therefore important to plan the application for full coverage and make sure that sections are thick enough for secure clip placement but not too thick to prevent slippage. Organising your hair into sections helps maintain a natural look, prevents tangles, and keeps the extensions in place. This method applies to all types of human hair extensions and is essential for achieving a flowing hairstyle.

Products That Help

You might be curious about whether certain products can help prevent slipping. The answer is yes, using some products for extensions can help keep clip-in extensions in place. Before you cut in your extensions, use a light-weight hairspray or texturising spray on your natural hair. This will increase friction and keep the extension clips firmly in place. To add more traction, you can also use a root-boosting powder. Remember to be careful when applying these products, as applying too much might make the hair excessively oily or sticky, which could, in turn, cause slippage of your extensions.

Fine Hair Solutions

Try this trick if you have fine hair that tends to slip. For fine hair extensions, before attaching the clip, you can add two bobby pins in a crisscross pattern at the base of your hair section. This technique will form a string anchor point. Bobby pins are an additional way to support your hair extensions and help reduce the risk of movement. You can also opt for lighter choices, such as smooth, sleek extensions, rather than thick, heavier clip-ins for better suitability and functionality. Additionally, you can apply dry shampoo at the roots and gently tease to create traction for the clips if your hair is fine.

Maintenance Checks

For your extension maintenance, try not to touch or adjust them more frequently, as this will prevent them from shifting throughout the day. Reposition the clips if you feel any movement or pain. A loose hairstyle, such as a bun or low ponytail, helps reduce excessive movement and friction. To keep your extensions smooth and blended, it is advised to keep a small comb or brush on hand for quick touch-ups.

Conclusion

If you’re concerned about the lifespan of clip-in hair extensions, you can use this guide to secure your extensions properly and help them last for a year or more if properly maintained. Above all, pay attention to careful handling, routine maintenance, and correct installation.

Read more:
Stop Clip-In Extensions from Slipping: Expert Tips