Business

Nothing can match the thrill of playing casino games – anytime you want, you get to see dealers shuffle cards, spin roulettes, and chat with you in real time.

And if you are craving for some adrenaline-pumping experience, SG88WIN is the best place to be. With its smooth streaming, real games, and unmatched bonuses, SG88WIN turns your mobile device into a high-end casino floor. Want to feel the thrill? Come to SG88WIN  now to get your welcome bonus and take part in the action!

The Authentic Experience On The Go

Many Singaporean players enjoy live casino table games because they are offering an authentic experience. At SG88WIN, classic favorites like blackjack, baccarat, and roulette as well as innovative live gameshows like Crazy Time, Lightning Storms, and Monopoly Live are streamed in high definition. To help you further immerse yourself in it, these games are played with live chat, multiple camera views, and real game equipment so that every game round is more engaging and transparent.

Zero Lag Experience

Live casino games are also using the best streaming technology to achieve a smooth flow without lags. This adaptive bitrate stream will make sure that when you play the game, you will not have to deal with buffering. Additionally, every live casino game is designed with an intuitive interface that fits any screen resolution whether on mobile, tablet, or desktop. With such consistency, Singaporean live casino players stay hooked to their favorite table games or gameshows, without experiencing any delays when their mobile data suddenly drops.

Game Variety

Saving you from traveling far to visit a casino or waiting in line to sit at the table, SG88WIN offers a diverse selection of live casino games. Anytime you want or anywhere you are, you can feel the adrenaline rush of dealing against the blackjack dealer or feel the lively crowds of Crazy Time.

SG88WIN partners with industry giants like Evolution Gaming, Sexy Baccarat, Dream Gaming, SA Gaming, and many others to provide you with 100+ live table games. What’s even great about it is that these tables have flexible betting limits, suitable to all budgets.

Safety And Security

Playing live casino games at SG88WIN is very safe and secure, offering players a worry-free gaming experience. The site uses the most advanced encryption technology to protect the personal and financial details that players are sharing on the site. Not to mention that the site is regulated and licensed, guaranteeing fair play and transparency.

Generous Live Casino Bonuses And Promotions

SG88WIN makes your gaming experience even more rewarding by offering tailored promotions for live casino players. From first deposit bonus, reload deals and up to live casino dealer challenges and baccarat win streaks, all of these offers aim to help you maximize your playing time and winning potential.

Wrap Up

These are only a few of the reasons why Singaporean players enjoy playing live casino games at SG88WIN. Instead of dealing with the traffic and waiting in line to join a table at the most luxurious casino halls in Singapore, all you have to do is reach up to your mobile browser, head on to SG88WIN, and browse to the live casino section of the site to experience the best and most immersive live casino experience.

FAQs:

What Is So Attractive About SG88WIN’s Live Casino Games To SG Players?

Games offered by SG88WIN are streamed in HD and offer user-friendly features as well as authentic gameplay, low latency, and 24/7 access.

Can You Play More than One Live Dealer Table Game Simultaneously?

Certainly, yes. The multiplay feature allows you to enjoy various table games simultaneously.

Which Games Do Singaporean Players Like Best?

The gaming preferences of Singaporean players are very diverse, yet there are several stand-out titles that they tend to enjoy, such as Live Baccarat, Sic Bo, Dragon Tiger, Blackjack, and Speed Roulette.

Read more:
Why Singaporean Players Love Live Casino Games At SG88WIN? 

Rheinisches Revier is undergoing an unprecedented transformation. The region is being redeveloped from Europe’s biggest lignite mining area into a dynamic innovation hub and a climate-neutral industrial region. It offers exceptional opportunities for investors.

Despite the lignite phase-out, Rheinisches Revier remains a hub for energy-intensive industry. What’s more, it’s setting the course for sustainable growth, technological renewal and the establishment of future-oriented companies. The region in North Rhine-Westphalia has long been an attractive industrial location due to its high concentration of globally leading companies. It also distinguishes itself with its outstanding infrastructure, proximity to international markets and excellent research landscape with renowned universities and institutes. Cooperation between science, business and politics is a lived reality here and offers an ideal environment for forward-looking projects.

Structural change in North Rhine-Westphalia: Key industries and support programmes

In this region, there’s a particular focus on the key industries of sustainable energy supply, digitalization, mobility and life sciences. Extensive support programs and investment incentives facilitate market entry and support both start-ups and established companies in their expansion. You can play an active role in structural change, profit from the transformation process and help shape the future.

Rheinisches Revier: An economy with prospects

Rheinisches Revier is a European model region for structural change – a status that guarantees additional financial resources and international visibility.

For investors, this means that they not only benefit from favorable locational factors in North Rhine-Westphalia and active economic development in Rheinisches Revier but will also become part of a network that consistently drives innovation and growth. Take advantage of this unique opportunity to help build a European model region and successfully realize your projects in Rheinisches Revier.

Central location, excellent transport links and innovative strength

Rheinisches Revier also impresses with its central location in North Rhine-Westphalia. Right in the heart of Europe. With excellent transport links – whether by road, rail or plane – you can quickly reach important economic centers such as Düsseldorf, Cologne, Brussels and Frankfurt. Europe’s most important seaports are also nearby. In addition, application-oriented research institutions, such as RWTH Aachen University and the Jülich Research Centre, provide access to the latest scientific findings and highly qualified specialists from North Rhine-Westphalia.

Shaping the future – seizing opportunities, embracing change

Lastly, the region of North Rhine-Westphalia widely recognized for its openness to new ideas and its willingness to actively shape change. Numerous initiatives and networks promote exchange and offer valuable contacts. Anyone who invests here will become part of a committed community that works together to find solutions to the challenges of tomorrow.

Discover Rheinisches Revier – your ideal location for sustainable investments, forward-looking technologies and entrepreneurial success! Become part of the change and take advantage of the many opportunities that this unique region in North Rhine-Westphalia has to offer.

Read more:
Rheinisches Revier – your future location in North Rhine-Westphalia for innovation and investment

Last week, the European Public Prosecutor’s Office issued a damning statement in Athens. Two former Greek government ministers are suspected of facilitating a long-running scheme to defraud the European Union’s farm subsidy system.

According to investigators, citizens across Greece received millions of euros in EU agricultural funds for neither owned nor leased pastureland, and for work they never performed. The result has been significant financial penalties for Greece, including a €400 million fine imposed by the European Commission, and the dissolution of the national agency responsible for managing these payments.

While the political implications are serious, this episode speaks to a deeper institutional vulnerability. It illustrates what happens when a policy system is designed to appear effective rather than to deliver real-world results. This failure is rooted in appearances, formalism, and convenience—precisely the same type of failure now defining the EU’s approach to nutrition policy.

For years, the European Commission has promoted front-of-pack nutrition labelling, particularly the Nutri-Score system, as a central tool in the fight against obesity and diet-related illness. Based on a colour-coded algorithm that ranks food products from A to E, Nutri-Score is designed to simplify nutritional information and help consumers make healthier choices. Policymakers have embraced it as a cost-effective and politically feasible intervention, while France, the birthplace of Nutri-Score, has gone so far as to propose making it mandatory.

But like the Greek subsidy model, this system is delivering far less than promised.

Controlled experiments suggest that front-of-pack labels can nudge consumers toward certain choices under highly specific conditions. However, the real-world evidence increasingly shows that these behavioural shifts are too small, too inconsistent, and too short-lived to produce any measurable benefit at the population level.

A clear example comes from the United Kingdom. In April 2022, England introduced mandatory calorie labelling on menus in large food outlets, citing public health benefits and an expected reduction in obesity. A comprehensive review of 25 independent studies, published by the Cochrane Library in early 2025, assessed the overall effect of calorie labelling on consumption. Across more than 10,000 participants in the UK, France, and the United States, the average impact was a reduction of just 11 calories per meal—barely the equivalent of a single crisp. That amounts to a 1.8 percent drop in caloric intake per meal, a change so minor that it has no relevance for public health outcomes.

In the years since implementation, England has seen no significant improvement in obesity rates or diet-related health indicators. The cost to businesses has been considerable, and the policy’s effectiveness has been negligible. As Professor Tom Sanders of King’s College London put it, consumers “get fatigue from calorie labelling in the long term,” and such marginal reductions are unlikely to make any difference over time. This is not an isolated failure; it is a systemic one. It shows that even when executed on a national scale, labelling schemes consistently fall short of their public health objectives.

That failure is not only a matter of scale. It is built into the design of the system itself. Nutri-Score, like other front-of-pack labels, applies a simplified formula to assign a grade based on nutrient content per 100 grams. It does not account for how a food is produced, how it is consumed in context, or whether it has undergone industrial processing. The algorithm rewards products that are easy to manipulate—those that can be reformulated to reduce certain ingredients while preserving shelf life, sweetness, or market appeal. Unsurprisingly, this structure tends to favour large-scale industrial producers with the resources to adapt, while penalising traditional, seasonal, or artisanal foods that may be nutritionally complex but do not fit the algorithmic mould.

The result is a system that reinforces, rather than reforms, the existing food economy. Products that meet the formal criteria receive a favourable score, regardless of their environmental footprint or degree of processing. This not only misleads consumers, it distorts the incentives for producers—encouraging the development of ultra-processed items that “perform” well on labels without contributing to healthier diets overall.

Meanwhile, Europe continues to see a rise in industrialised livestock farms and the consolidation of food production around a handful of scalable, uniform models. The same incentives that make these systems efficient also make them ideal candidates for nutrition labelling schemes. They can be easily adjusted to comply with nutrient thresholds, manufactured at volume, and distributed across borders. Smaller producers, working within agroecological or local food systems, are often left behind.

What the Greek subsidy scandal and the continued reliance on front-of-pack labels have in common is a dangerous faith in superficial mechanisms. In both cases, public authorities have favoured tools that are administratively simple and politically presentable over those that demand accountability and structural reform. Labels, like subsidy paperwork, offer a sense of order—but too often, they obscure the underlying dysfunction.

If the European Union is serious about building a food system that supports health, sustainability, and equity, it must move beyond cosmetic solutions. That means addressing the root causes of poor nutrition: poverty, aggressive marketing, lack of access to fresh food, and the industrial dominance of supply chains. It means reforming subsidies, regulating advertising to children, supporting small and medium-sized producers, and investing in public health infrastructure.

Labelling, however visually appealing, is not a substitute for strategy. It is time to stop mistaking visibility for effectiveness and focus instead on the policies that actually shape what people eat, how food is produced, and who benefits from the system as it stands.

Read more:
When Labels Fail: What a €400 Million Fraud Tells Us About the Illusion of Reform in Europe’s Food Policy

The Co-op has announced it will stop selling produce from Israel and 16 other nations it deems “countries of concern” over human rights violations, in a move that has drawn criticism from politicians and praise from ethical sourcing campaigners.

The supermarket chain said the shift in policy is part of its broader commitment to ethical trading and peace advocacy, following a mandate from its members. Under the revised guidelines, it will phase out products where possible from countries facing “internationally recognised community-wide human rights abuses and violations of international law.”

The countries named in the policy include Israel, Iran, Russia, North Korea, and Mali. Affected products include Israeli carrots, Russian vodka, and mangoes from Mali, which will be gradually removed from shelves and ingredient sourcing from this month onwards.

Debbie White, chair of the Co-op board, said the decision aligned with the retailer’s values and legacy of ethical sourcing.

“We are committed, where we can, to removing products and ingredients from our shelves which are sourced from those countries where the international consensus demonstrates there is not alignment with what happens in those countries and our co-operative values and principles,” White said.

“This policy is a natural progression of our history of doing the right thing, from supporting Fairtrade to championing ethical supply chains.”

The Co-op stated that its decisions were guided by three criteria: formal international findings of human rights violations, the potential for Co-op’s actions to alleviate suffering, and the impact of its stance on its commercial integrity as a co-operative business.

The move has reignited debate around the role of supermarkets in foreign policy, with some hailing it as a principled stance and others accusing the retailer of overreach.

Dame Priti Patel, the shadow foreign secretary, condemned the decision to include Israel in the boycott, saying: “This is a totally unacceptable move from the Co-op. The supermarket chain should be focused on delivering goods for their customers, not playing student union politics with international affairs.”

“They should apologise and immediately revoke this crass decision.”

The Co-op previously excluded goods produced in Israeli settlements in the occupied Palestinian territories, including the West Bank and Gaza, but had not extended this policy to all Israeli-sourced products until now.

The policy will be implemented on a “where possible” basis, indicating that in cases where alternatives cannot be sourced, some products may continue to be sold temporarily.

The list of countries also includes some whose goods rarely appear in UK supply chains. However, the Co-op said the principle of refusing to benefit from trade with nations guilty of systemic abuses was a key part of its ethical framework.

The announcement comes amid rising political tensions surrounding imports linked to regimes accused of violating international law. Other retailers are expected to monitor the impact of the Co-op’s decision, as consumer pressure over ethical trade continues to grow.

Read more:
Co-op to halt sales of Israeli goods and other imports from ‘countries of concern’

High earners in the UK are facing a sharp rise in tax investigations as HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) intensifies scrutiny of the wealthiest Britons following a record-breaking year for compliance revenue.

A Freedom of Information request by accountancy firm Pinsent Masons has revealed that HMRC’s wealthy and mid-sized business compliance directorate raised more than £1.5 billion from investigations in 2024 — double the figure from the previous year. The directorate focuses on individuals earning over £200,000 annually or holding assets exceeding £2 million.

The unprecedented returns have prompted HMRC to bolster its compliance efforts, with 400 new specialist compliance officers due to be recruited over the next four years. The Treasury expects the expanded workforce to generate an additional £500 million in tax revenue by 2030.

“HMRC has been set some very hard targets for extra tax collection by the chancellor,” said Ian Robotham of Pinsent Masons. “It is hard to see how they can achieve those targets without a sharp rise in tax investigations into the wealthy.”

The tax authority has been ramping up its use of artificial intelligence and data analytics to root out tax avoidance and non-compliance. Central to its efforts is the Connect system, a powerful data-matching tool that cross-references individuals’ and businesses’ tax returns with financial information from banks, land registries, social media, and overseas jurisdictions.

Through global agreements like the OECD’s Common Reporting Standard, HMRC now receives automatic notifications when UK residents move money to foreign accounts in participating countries.

Investigations can be triggered by anomalies in tax returns, tip-offs, or risk assessments. Once a review begins, high-net-worth individuals may be asked to provide detailed documentation, including personal and business bank statements, trust deeds, and offshore account details. They may also face interviews with compliance officers.

Penalties can vary depending on the nature of the breach — from simple carelessness to deliberate concealment — and can exceed 100 per cent of the tax owed. In serious cases, criminal prosecution is possible.

One of the highest-profile examples of HMRC’s tougher approach came in 2023 when Bernie Ecclestone, the former Formula One chief, pleaded guilty to fraud after failing to declare more than £400 million in an offshore trust. He avoided jail but paid £652.6 million in tax, interest, and penalties.

The total amount collected by HMRC from the wealthiest taxpayers — those earning over £200,000 or with significant assets — hit £5.2 billion last year, up from £4 billion in 2023. HMRC estimates that this group still underpays tax by as much as £2.1 billion annually.

In a statement, HMRC said: “It’s our duty to ensure everyone pays the right tax under the law, regardless of wealth or status. The government is delivering the most ambitious ever package to close the tax gap and bring in an extra £7.5 billion for public services per year by 2029 to 2030.”

The growing pressure on high earners to comply with an increasingly aggressive tax regime comes as the government looks to close funding gaps without further raising headline tax rates. With the wealthy firmly in the crosshairs, advisers are warning clients to ensure their financial affairs are watertight — or risk being next in line.

Read more:
HMRC targets high earners in record tax crackdown after £1.5bn haul

Transport for London (TfL) has signed a major green energy deal with EDF Renewables UK to supply the Tube with clean electricity from a new solar farm in Essex, marking a significant step towards its goal of running the capital’s transport network on 100 per cent renewable energy by 2030.

The 15-year Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) will see EDF’s subsidiary, Longfield Solar Energy Farm Limited, provide around 80 gigawatt hours (GWh) of electricity annually to TfL—enough to power more than 29,000 homes or the entire Tube network for a year. Construction of the new Longfield solar facility is set to begin in 2026, with full operation expected by the end of the decade.

The solar farm, covering 400 hectares of land near Chelmsford, will not only support TfL’s decarbonisation but also help green the National Grid. It will provide around 400 GWh per year in total and deliver a biodiversity net gain of over 87 per cent—eight times the legal requirement. The site will include tree and hedgerow planting, rewilding areas and wildlife corridors to boost local flora and fauna.

As the UK’s largest single electricity consumer, TfL currently uses 1.6 terawatt hours (TWh) annually—about the same as 420,000 homes. Under its long-term energy strategy, TfL aims to source up to 70 per cent of its power through direct PPAs, with the remainder via green tariffs, helping to shield operations from market volatility and price shocks.

The PPA will also support new green jobs during construction and operations, while bolstering energy security by reducing reliance on fossil fuels. EDF Renewables’ CEO Matthieu Hue described the partnership as a “significant step forward” in powering essential public services with low-carbon energy.

Lilli Matson, TfL’s Chief Safety, Health and Environment Officer, said the project marks a “new green era” for the Tube, adding: “We are using our purchasing power to make public transport the most environmentally sustainable choice Londoners can make.”

TfL also announced it has launched a tender for a partner to help deliver additional purpose-built solar farms that could supply up to 64 megawatts of power—around five per cent of the Tube’s total electricity needs—through direct private wire connections.

The announcement was welcomed by political and industry leaders alike. Energy Minister Michael Shanks MP said the agreement supports “local jobs whilst reducing emissions” and aligns with the government’s Plan for Change. The Mayor of London, Sadiq Khan, hailed the move as further proof that London is leading the way in climate action.

The deal comes as the Mayor launches a new climate finance taskforce to help unlock the £75 billion of private investment needed to achieve net zero in the capital by 2030.

Rachel Cary of Energy UK said the PPA demonstrates how “collaboration can help power London’s vital public transport network sustainably”, while Rollo Maschietto of the Renewable Energy Association called it “a blueprint for how the public sector can get behind the energy transition while supporting green jobs and strengthening energy security”.

With its new solar partnership and future plans for direct grid connections, TfL is setting the pace for how large public bodies can decarbonise operations at scale—while delivering cleaner air, lower bills and new investment in UK renewables.

Read more:
Tube to be powered by clean solar energy under new TfL and EDF Renewables deal

The UK’s Big Four accountancy firms have slashed graduate recruitment and cut hundreds of early-career roles as artificial intelligence begins to automate the junior work once assigned to school-leavers and university graduates.

Deloitte, EY, KPMG and PwC — who together employ around 100,000 staff across the UK — have scaled back their graduate and school leaver intake over the past two years, with some reducing hiring by nearly a third.

KPMG made the steepest cuts, trimming its graduate cohort from 1,399 in 2023 to just 942 — a 33 per cent reduction. Deloitte cut its scheme by 18 per cent, followed by EY and PwC with cuts of 11 and 6 per cent respectively.

The drop in hiring is being fuelled by an industry-wide pivot towards cost-cutting, as firms look to maintain seven-figure partner payouts in the face of a post-Covid slump in consulting and tighter client budgets. Increasingly, those cuts are being delivered by generative AI tools like ChatGPT, which can automate tasks that were once the training ground for junior analysts.

“The Big Four are looking at AI very seriously to replicate junior work more cost-effectively,” said James O’Dowd, managing partner at executive search firm Patrick Morgan.

In parallel with AI expansion, all four firms are doubling down on offshoring, shifting work to lower-cost locations in India, Malaysia and the Philippines — further eroding the traditional pipeline for UK-based entry-level roles.

Job listings in the sector reflect the trend: graduate job adverts in accountancy have dropped 44 per cent year-on-year, significantly outpacing the wider downturn in graduate vacancies.

Despite scaling back recruitment, the Big Four are racing to position themselves at the forefront of the AI economy. Deloitte, PwC and EY are now developing AI assurance services — tools that audit and validate the performance, safety and bias levels of AI models.

Deloitte audit partner Richard Tedder described AI assurance as “critical to adoption”, while PwC is understood to be close to launching its own service.

The move reflects broader ambitions to make the UK a global AI hub. Government data suggests that AI could add £200 billion to the UK economy, with SME adoption alone offering a potential £78 billion boost over the next decade.

But challenges remain, particularly around public confidence. KPMG’s own research reveals that just 42 per cent of UK adults currently trust AI, and nearly three-quarters report having no formal training in it.

As firms pivot to monetise the AI boom, many in the graduate job market are left wondering what future roles will look like. While AI creates opportunity in some areas, it is rapidly erasing others — particularly at the bottom of the corporate ladder.

With fewer foot-in-the-door jobs, and automation only set to increase, a fundamental question is emerging: if AI is replacing the entry-level, where will the next generation of partners come from?

Read more:
AI takes entry-level jobs as big four slash graduate hiring

The sixth day of the ongoing High Court trial between PPE Medpro and the Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) turned its focus to one of the central issues of the £122 million legal dispute — the sterility of the surgical gowns at the heart of the case.

PPE Medpro’s legal team called expert witness Professor Anthony Coates, a leading microbiologist, to give evidence on the government’s claims that the gowns were unfit for use due to microbial contamination. What followed was a detailed and at times pointed examination of the methodology and conclusions behind the DHSC’s gown testing regime.

Test samples ‘not representative’

Coates was highly critical of the government’s testing practices. Under examination by Charles Samek KC, he argued that the samples taken from the PPE Medpro gowns were not representative of the full shipment and were handled in such a way that made them unreliable as evidence of original contamination.

Central to his concern was the time lag between delivery and testing. Coates explained that some gowns were tested over a year after arrival and had been stored in unknown conditions — including open-air container parks — which could have exposed them to contamination after the fact.

“You cannot determine the sterility of a gown a year later when it’s been stored in containers without knowing the exact environmental conditions,” Coates told the court.

Questions over gown handling and testing controls

He also raised red flags about the lack of proper chain-of-custody documentation, noting that gown batch numbers and container IDs were not always linked to test results — a serious issue in sterility testing protocols. In the absence of these records, Coates said, the possibility of post-delivery contamination could not be ruled out.

The professor added that the lab handling the tests — Sheffield-based Swann-Morton — had no documented testing controls in place, no historical contamination data, and did not appear to conduct comparative testing against known sterile controls. This, he said, would be standard practice in such assessments and casts further doubt on the findings.

“The lack of positive and negative controls means we cannot know whether the lab environment itself contributed to contamination,” Coates said.

Coates also offered an alternative explanation for the bacteria found on the gowns. Rather than indicating manufacturing or packaging failures in China, the organisms identified — such as Staphylococcus epidermidis — were consistent with environmental or skin flora, suggesting they may have been introduced through handling in the UK.

He questioned the presence of several bacteria types that appeared only in one or two samples, calling this distribution “random and inconsistent with a single-source manufacturing contamination.”

Useability not properly explored

During cross-examination by DHSC’s counsel, Coates stood by his opinion that the data could not support the conclusion that the gowns were non-sterile at the point of manufacture. He also reinforced a point raised by PPE Medpro earlier in the trial — that the DHSC never explored whether the gowns could be repurposed for non-sterile use.

When pressed about whether he could guarantee the gowns were safe, Coates was clear that he could not — but argued that the DHSC had not proved they were unsafe either, at least not at the point of delivery.

“If the government’s case is that these gowns were unsterile at manufacture, they need better evidence,” he said.

Professor Coates’ evidence marks a crucial moment in the trial, as sterility concerns are central to the DHSC’s claim for breach of contract. If the government cannot convincingly establish that the gowns were contaminated before delivery — or that it followed appropriate testing protocols — its justification for rejecting the PPE Medpro shipment could come under serious legal challenge.

The court will continue on Wednesday 25 June, when further expert witnesses are expected to be cross-examined.

Read more:
Expert witness casts doubt on DHSC’s sterility testing in PPE Medpro case

Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds has thrown his weight behind proposals to strengthen the UK’s steel import protections, stepping in to tighten trade safeguards beyond those recommended by the Trade Remedies Authority (TRA) in response to mounting concerns over redirected global steel supply.

The move, welcomed by industry leaders as a “tremendous outcome,” will see the government reduce the annual liberalisation of steel quotas from 3% to just 0.1% — aligning the UK’s approach with the European Union and helping to shield domestic producers from a surge in cheap imports, particularly in the wake of new tariffs on steel imposed by US President Donald Trump.

In a letter to TRA Chair Nick Baird, Reynolds confirmed the government would also introduce a cap on residual quotas to prevent individual countries from dominating UK import volumes and damaging the competitiveness of British steelmakers. The Secretary of State further backed TRA recommendations to prevent unused quarterly quotas from rolling over and to stop countries with their own specific quotas from accessing residual volumes in the final quarter.

UK Steel, the sector’s leading trade body, had lobbied for the tougher measures amid growing fears that global oversupply — exacerbated by US protectionism — could result in a flood of cheap, state-subsidised steel entering the UK market.

“This is a tremendous outcome and a demonstration of the Secretary of State’s commitment to our industry,” said Gareth Stace, Director-General of UK Steel. “These measures will reduce the pressure of steel diversion from the US and EU and prevent countries that flood international markets with unsustainably cheap steel from swamping the UK and driving our steel manufacturers out of business.”

The strengthened safeguards are viewed by industry as essential to defending the UK’s remaining steelmaking capacity, which employs over 33,000 people and supports critical supply chains in construction, automotive, defence, and energy.

Stace added that the measures must now be underpinned by longer-term reforms, calling on the government to introduce a new trade defence mechanism when the current safeguards expire. “This should be introduced in January. The forthcoming Trade Strategy has the potential to deliver new legislation that will equip Government with the tools it needs to defend our companies from the subsidised steel that is currently flooding steel markets at unsustainable price levels.”

The announcement comes at a time of significant pressure on global steel markets. President Trump’s new wave of tariffs has prompted fears that redirected supply — particularly from China, Turkey and India — could overwhelm smaller markets like the UK.

Industry insiders say the intervention by Reynolds signals a shift in tone from the new Labour government, suggesting a more proactive, interventionist approach to strategic industrial sectors such as steel.

The Department for Business and Trade said further details on the Trade Strategy — including potential legislative proposals to reinforce UK trade defences — would be published later this summer.

Read more:
Government backs UK Steel call to tighten import safeguards amid threat of global oversupply

Across the UK and internationally, homeowners are rethinking how they use their outdoor spaces. Gardens are no longer simply areas for planting or summer barbecues.

Increasingly, they are being transformed into functional, stylish extensions of the home. This growing focus on outdoor living presents clear opportunities for businesses across design, retail, landscaping and property services.

Consumer expectations are evolving, and companies that respond to this shift with practical, personalised solutions are well placed to benefit.

The Lifestyle Shift Behind Outdoor Living

The idea of using outdoor space more intentionally is not new, but the momentum has grown substantially in recent years. With more people working from home and spending time in their local environment, gardens are now being viewed as places to relax, work, socialise and unwind.

Retailers are adapting to meet this demand. The Best Backyard, for instance is an Australian brand who have achieved success by focussing on helping families get outside with outdoor furniture and children’s play equipment that fits into everyday routines. Other brands such as Garden Trading in the UK and Outer in the USA have embraced this same ethos, offering curated outdoor collections that blend indoor comfort with outdoor durability. These examples show how aligning with lifestyle shifts can create strong, future-facing brand propositions.

The Garden as a Personal Retreat

For many homeowners, outdoor spaces are becoming a retreat from busy lives and constant screens. Even small gardens are being adapted to support relaxation, mindfulness and wellbeing. Features such as quiet seating areas, water elements and soft lighting are now high on the wish list.

This shift presents an opportunity for businesses involved in outdoor design, landscaping and home improvement. There is strong demand for services and products that help people build calming, personalised outdoor environments. Garden consultants, furniture designers and wellness brands can all tap into this need by offering packages that combine aesthetics with emotional value.

Boosting Property Appeal and Value

Beyond lifestyle improvements, there is also a financial incentive. Well-designed outdoor areas are increasingly viewed as long-term investments. A garden that includes quality decking, smart lighting, shaded seating or a functional dining space can significantly improve a property’s appeal to potential buyers.

This has opened up new opportunities for businesses in construction, landscaping and real estate. Firms that can communicate the added value of garden enhancements are better positioned to attract homeowners who see their gardens as part of a broader investment in their home.

Rising Demand for Quality and Durability

With increased spending on outdoor spaces, homeowners are placing greater emphasis on quality. Products must now offer both style and longevity. There is growing interest in weatherproof materials, modular designs and sustainable choices that stand up to daily use without losing their visual appeal.

This creates room for businesses that can supply high-end finishes and durable materials. Whether it is outdoor kitchens, furniture, lighting or textiles, the message is clear: consumers are willing to pay more for products that perform well and reflect their design values.

Personalisation and Flexibility Are Priorities

Homeowners are also looking for outdoor spaces that feel personal and tailored to their needs. Generic layouts and one-size-fits-all designs are no longer enough. Instead, people want spaces that reflect how they live, entertain and unwind.

Businesses can meet this demand by offering custom-built features, modular furniture and design consultation services. The goal is to help clients create outdoor areas that evolve with their lifestyle. This personal approach not only supports customer satisfaction but also helps build long-term brand loyalty.

What Businesses Can Take Away

The rise of outdoor living is part of a broader shift in how people think about home, wellbeing and personal space. It is about creating environments that support day-to-day life, reflect individual style and bring value beyond aesthetics.

Companies like The Best Backyard, Garden Trading and others have demonstrated that success in this space comes from understanding the changing needs of modern households. Businesses that provide well-designed, adaptable and durable products will continue to find opportunities in this growing sector.

The message is clear. Outdoor living is no longer a luxury or seasonal trend. It is a core part of how people want to live. For businesses, it is a chance to innovate, connect and grow by helping customers make the most of their space, just beyond the back door.

Read more:
Why More Homeowners Are Investing in Their Gardens and What Businesses Can Learn from It